3,233
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Reports

Design of BCC refractory multi-principal element alloys with superior mechanical properties

, , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 133-140 | Received 04 Nov 2020, Published online: 31 Jan 2022

Figures & data

Figure 1 The analyses of the correlations capable of predicting tensile yield strength or ductility via a dataset comprising a series of RMPEAs with VEC ≤ 4.5. (a) Relationships among average shear modulus mismatch (δuave), atomic radius mismatch (δrave) and yield strength (σy); (b) effects of atomic-size differences (δ), valence electron concentration (VEC), and enthalpy of mixing (ΔHmix) on tensile fracture elongation (ϵ).

Figure 1 The analyses of the correlations capable of predicting tensile yield strength or ductility via a dataset comprising a series of RMPEAs with VEC ≤ 4.5. (a) Relationships among average shear modulus mismatch (δuave), atomic radius mismatch (δrave) and yield strength (σy); (b) effects of atomic-size differences (δ), valence electron concentration (VEC), and enthalpy of mixing (ΔHmix) on tensile fracture elongation (ϵ).

Figure 2. (a) The true stress-strain curves and corresponding data for three representative RMPEAs; (b) the tensile strength-ductility combination in comparison with previously reported BCC RMPEAs [Citation4,Citation12,Citation13,Citation27–34].

Figure 2. (a) The true stress-strain curves and corresponding data for three representative RMPEAs; (b) the tensile strength-ductility combination in comparison with previously reported BCC RMPEAs [Citation4,Citation12,Citation13,Citation27–34].

Figure 3. Microscopic structure studies for (a) Nb20Ta5, (b) Nb15Ta10 and Nb10Ta15, respectively. (a1-c1) The IPF maps and corresponding grain size distributions; (a2-c2) the BSE-SEM images; (a3-c3) the elemental distribution maps.

Figure 3. Microscopic structure studies for (a) Nb20Ta5, (b) Nb15Ta10 and Nb10Ta15, respectively. (a1-c1) The IPF maps and corresponding grain size distributions; (a2-c2) the BSE-SEM images; (a3-c3) the elemental distribution maps.

Figure 4. (a) XRD spectra and the BCC phase map and (b) the bright-field TEM images with corresponding SAED patterns of Nb20Ta5, Nb15Ta10 and Nb10Ta15 alloys, respectively; (c-d) the HRTEM micrographs and Fourier-filtered transformed (FFT) image for (-2 0 0) planes of Nb20Ta5 and Nb10Ta15 alloys, respectively.

Figure 4. (a) XRD spectra and the BCC phase map and (b) the bright-field TEM images with corresponding SAED patterns of Nb20Ta5, Nb15Ta10 and Nb10Ta15 alloys, respectively; (c-d) the HRTEM micrographs and Fourier-filtered transformed (FFT) image for (-2 0 0) planes of Nb20Ta5 and Nb10Ta15 alloys, respectively.

Figure 5 Analysis of fracture mechanism performed in Nb20Ta5 and Nb10Ta15. (a) Optical image of the tensile fracture specimen and the red frame position indicates the interest region for the following EBSD and TEM analyses; (b-c) SEM images of the fractured surfaces; (d-e) lateral morphology of the tensile fracture sample; (f-g) the IPF maps from the near tensile fracture region; and corresponding point-point misorientation analyses from the typical lenticular structure; (h-i) the bright-field TEM images and corresponding SAED patterns for the fractured specimens; (j-k) the dislocation patterning for the fractured specimen in Nb20Ta5 alloy.

Figure 5 Analysis of fracture mechanism performed in Nb20Ta5 and Nb10Ta15. (a) Optical image of the tensile fracture specimen and the red frame position indicates the interest region for the following EBSD and TEM analyses; (b-c) SEM images of the fractured surfaces; (d-e) lateral morphology of the tensile fracture sample; (f-g) the IPF maps from the near tensile fracture region; and corresponding point-point misorientation analyses from the typical lenticular structure; (h-i) the bright-field TEM images and corresponding SAED patterns for the fractured specimens; (j-k) the dislocation patterning for the fractured specimen in Nb20Ta5 alloy.
Supplemental material

Supplemental Material

Download MS Word (2.3 MB)