2,118
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Reports

Toughening 3D-printed Zr-based bulk metallic glass via synergistic defects engineering

, &
Pages 377-384 | Received 02 Dec 2021, Accepted 14 Mar 2022, Published online: 30 Mar 2022

Figures & data

Figure 1. (a, b) XRD and DSC results of the SLMed Zr60.14Cu22.31Fe4.85Al9.7Ag3 BMG samples fabricated using different energy densities, compared with the original powders; (c) Correlation between the crystallization/porosity fractions of as-printed samples and the energy density; (d) The bright field TEM image of the as-printed BMG with a crystalline fraction of 7.03%. Insets are the selected area electron diffraction (SAED) patterns from regions S1 and S2, respectively; (e) SEM images showing the samples with various porosities.

Figure 1. (a, b) XRD and DSC results of the SLMed Zr60.14Cu22.31Fe4.85Al9.7Ag3 BMG samples fabricated using different energy densities, compared with the original powders; (c) Correlation between the crystallization/porosity fractions of as-printed samples and the energy density; (d) The bright field TEM image of the as-printed BMG with a crystalline fraction of 7.03%. Insets are the selected area electron diffraction (SAED) patterns from regions S1 and S2, respectively; (e) SEM images showing the samples with various porosities.

Figure 2. (a) Compressive stress-strain curves and (b) fracture toughness of the SLMed BMG samples with varying porosity and crystallization fractions.

Figure 2. (a) Compressive stress-strain curves and (b) fracture toughness of the SLMed BMG samples with varying porosity and crystallization fractions.

Figure 3. (a, b) Cross-section SEM images showing the interactions between micro-pores and shear bands; (c) The cumulative probability of stress drops for samples with different porosities. Inset shows the enlarged serration region from stress-strain curves; (d, e) Strain field of two BMG samples with a porosity of 2.87% and 17.40% after being compressed to 4% strain in finite element simulation.

Figure 3. (a, b) Cross-section SEM images showing the interactions between micro-pores and shear bands; (c) The cumulative probability of stress drops for samples with different porosities. Inset shows the enlarged serration region from stress-strain curves; (d, e) Strain field of two BMG samples with a porosity of 2.87% and 17.40% after being compressed to 4% strain in finite element simulation.

Figure 4. The relationship between the crystalline fraction and fracture toughness and width of shear-off region.

Figure 4. The relationship between the crystalline fraction and fracture toughness and width of shear-off region.

Figure 5. Plot of fracture strength as a function of plasticity for 3D-printed BMGs and BMG composites. The overall mechanical performance of our optimized materials via defect engineering surpasses that of previously reported 3D-printed BMGs and BMG composites [Citation7, Citation9,Citation10,Citation14,Citation29–41].

Figure 5. Plot of fracture strength as a function of plasticity for 3D-printed BMGs and BMG composites. The overall mechanical performance of our optimized materials via defect engineering surpasses that of previously reported 3D-printed BMGs and BMG composites [Citation7, Citation9,Citation10,Citation14,Citation29–41].
Supplemental material

Supplemental Material

Download MS Word (10.5 MB)