Figures & data
![](/cms/asset/4a5d078c-7dee-4aec-8bdb-987e2ab50451/tmrl_a_2126736_uf0001_oc.jpg)
Table 1. Starting material compositions and properties of the products.
Figure 1. (A-G) SEM images and (a-g) TEM images of Sample 7 to Sample 1. (H) Comparison of FT-IR Spectrum between Sample 1, 4 and 6. (h) Effect of solution concentration to average particle size of the resulting samples.
![Figure 1. (A-G) SEM images and (a-g) TEM images of Sample 7 to Sample 1. (H) Comparison of FT-IR Spectrum between Sample 1, 4 and 6. (h) Effect of solution concentration to average particle size of the resulting samples.](/cms/asset/0d1b619b-9559-4bb0-bd1c-53bfc493add0/tmrl_a_2126736_f0001_oc.jpg)
Figure 2. (a) Self-assembly and related behavior of CTAB, TEOS, and TMB in solution. The formation mechanism of mesoporous silicas in (b) dilute solution and (c) concentrated solution.
![Figure 2. (a) Self-assembly and related behavior of CTAB, TEOS, and TMB in solution. The formation mechanism of mesoporous silicas in (b) dilute solution and (c) concentrated solution.](/cms/asset/ffd921ed-f791-4e44-8ff5-f36250958873/tmrl_a_2126736_f0002_oc.jpg)
Figure 3. (a, e) XRD patterns, (b, f) N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms, (c, g) the corresponding BJH-adsorption pore size distribution curves and (d, h) particle size distribution curves of the resulting materials: (a-d) MCM-41-type mesoporous silicas in dilute solution and (e-h) cocoon-shaped hollow mesoporous silicas in concentrated solution.
![Figure 3. (a, e) XRD patterns, (b, f) N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms, (c, g) the corresponding BJH-adsorption pore size distribution curves and (d, h) particle size distribution curves of the resulting materials: (a-d) MCM-41-type mesoporous silicas in dilute solution and (e-h) cocoon-shaped hollow mesoporous silicas in concentrated solution.](/cms/asset/ba5336f3-2cb1-4205-b4c7-2d84c004de5e/tmrl_a_2126736_f0003_oc.jpg)
Figure 4. The nonequilibrium deposition/diffusion behavior of rod-like micelles on the emulsion surface, supposing a two-dimensional facet on the spherical emulsion subject to simple harmonic perturbation .
![Figure 4. The nonequilibrium deposition/diffusion behavior of rod-like micelles on the emulsion surface, supposing a two-dimensional facet on the spherical emulsion subject to simple harmonic perturbation δmcos(mθ).](/cms/asset/48123cf8-ce6d-41a9-bd9c-221a9f3f5300/tmrl_a_2126736_f0004_oc.jpg)
Figure 5. Representative comparison between (a-d) theoretical simulations based on Equation Equation(4)(4)
(4) (
,
) and (e) experimental results. Representative theoretical simulations of the morphology on the zOx plane with (a) a steady-state diffusion of
, simple harmonic perturbation of (b)
, (c)
, and (d)
.
![Figure 5. Representative comparison between (a-d) theoretical simulations based on Equation Equation(4)(4) r=R+δmcos(mθ)(4) (R=216, δm=0.05) and (e) experimental results. Representative theoretical simulations of the morphology on the zOx plane with (a) a steady-state diffusion of m=0, simple harmonic perturbation of (b) m=8, (c) m=12, and (d) m=16.](/cms/asset/a98cb0bb-bc04-4485-9ff5-d4c0fa98e7ff/tmrl_a_2126736_f0005_oc.jpg)