Figures & data
Table 1. Overview of experiments.
Table 2. Descriptive statistics.
Figure 1. Experiment I testing effect of inclusion on emotional response, barplot with standard error bars. Note: Full regression, see .
![Figure 1. Experiment I testing effect of inclusion on emotional response, barplot with standard error bars. Note: Full regression, see Table 3.](/cms/asset/34cb538b-5c06-4641-b6ad-080434a254fd/rdij_a_2155205_f0001_c.jpg)
Figure 2. Experiment II testing effect of inclusion on emotional response, barplot with standard error bars. Note: Only result of intensity is significant (b = 1.3, se=.462, p=.008).
![Figure 2. Experiment II testing effect of inclusion on emotional response, barplot with standard error bars. Note: Only result of intensity is significant (b = 1.3, se=.462, p=.008).](/cms/asset/ccb6276f-a925-4a49-a211-f6d535e858a8/rdij_a_2155205_f0002_c.jpg)
Table 3. Effect of IJ characteristics on emotional responses.
Figure 3. Effect of immersive narratives on emotional response, barplot with standard error bars. Note: Only negative emotions (b=.621, se=.236, p=.01) is significant.
![Figure 3. Effect of immersive narratives on emotional response, barplot with standard error bars. Note: Only negative emotions (b=.621, se=.236, p=.01) is significant.](/cms/asset/6d878b55-0ca0-408e-806f-30ab19587df0/rdij_a_2155205_f0003_c.jpg)
Figure 4. Effect interaction possibilities vs. no interaction possibilities on emotional response, barplot with standard error bars. Note: Only result of intensity (b=.932, se=.365, p=.01) is significant.
![Figure 4. Effect interaction possibilities vs. no interaction possibilities on emotional response, barplot with standard error bars. Note: Only result of intensity (b=.932, se=.365, p=.01) is significant.](/cms/asset/0fa24f83-5b72-44a7-a395-93f5a183119e/rdij_a_2155205_f0004_c.jpg)