Figures & data
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of the cohort.
Table 2 Adverse events during study period.
Figure 2 Linear mixed models with time modelled as categorical variable (black). In grey are the 95% confidence intervals; the lead-in period is highlighted in green. The red line is a linear mixed model fitted on the lead-in data (solid) and extrapolated into the treatment period (dotted).
![Figure 2 Linear mixed models with time modelled as categorical variable (black). In grey are the 95% confidence intervals; the lead-in period is highlighted in green. The red line is a linear mixed model fitted on the lead-in data (solid) and extrapolated into the treatment period (dotted).](/cms/asset/cec1c63d-5278-44a7-a87e-30e01c65eb1b/iafd_a_1632899_f0002_c.jpg)
Figure 3 Linear mixed models with time modelled as categorical variable (black). In grey are the 95% confidence intervals; the lead-in period is highlighted in green.
![Figure 3 Linear mixed models with time modelled as categorical variable (black). In grey are the 95% confidence intervals; the lead-in period is highlighted in green.](/cms/asset/f3868cd9-eb73-419f-828c-58a09cf54ace/iafd_a_1632899_f0003_c.jpg)
Figure 5 HERV-K DNA and RPP30 copy numbers were measured in all samples by digital PCR and the ratio of HERV-K/RPP30 was calculated as a measure of nongenomic HERV-K. (A) Absolute value of HERV-K DNA/RPP30 in untreated samples (N = 22) and at weeks 8 (W8; N = 15) and 24 of treatment (W24; N = 18) (Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test). (B) The relative percent change of HERV-K/RPP30 at each follow-up visit (W8 and W24) compared to the HERV-K/RPP30 at the untreated visits (average of screening and baseline) was calculated (Wilcoxon signed rank test).
![Figure 5 HERV-K DNA and RPP30 copy numbers were measured in all samples by digital PCR and the ratio of HERV-K/RPP30 was calculated as a measure of nongenomic HERV-K. (A) Absolute value of HERV-K DNA/RPP30 in untreated samples (N = 22) and at weeks 8 (W8; N = 15) and 24 of treatment (W24; N = 18) (Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test). (B) The relative percent change of HERV-K/RPP30 at each follow-up visit (W8 and W24) compared to the HERV-K/RPP30 at the untreated visits (average of screening and baseline) was calculated (Wilcoxon signed rank test).](/cms/asset/f6d60547-e9af-409e-b81c-75860c9ace5a/iafd_a_1632899_f0005_b.jpg)