1,578
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Clinical

Comparison Of King’s Clinical Staging In Multinational Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Cohorts

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 71-81 | Received 06 Apr 2022, Accepted 13 Jun 2022, Published online: 19 Jul 2022

Figures & data

Figure 1 Participant flow diagram for the PatientsLikeMe database.

Figure 1 Participant flow diagram for the PatientsLikeMe database.

Table 1 Baseline characteristics King’s College Hospital (KCH), LiCALS and MitoTarget, PatientsLikeMe and PRO-ACT databases with values expressed as Mean (95% Confidence Interval) or Number (% of total).

Figure 2 Box plot of standardized times to each stage in all 3,026 deceased patients from the five databases (KCH, PatientsLikeMe, LiCALS, MitoTarget and PRO-ACT) using every milestone reached.

Figure 2 Box plot of standardized times to each stage in all 3,026 deceased patients from the five databases (KCH, PatientsLikeMe, LiCALS, MitoTarget and PRO-ACT) using every milestone reached.

Figure 3 Box plot of standardized times to each stage in the 1,959 deceased patients from PatientsLikeMe, LiCALS, MitoTarget and PRO-ACT databases using every milestone reached.

Figure 3 Box plot of standardized times to each stage in the 1,959 deceased patients from PatientsLikeMe, LiCALS, MitoTarget and PRO-ACT databases using every milestone reached.

Table 2 Standardized times to every milestone reached and milestone timings for King’s College Hospital (KCH), PatientsLikeMe, LiCALS, MitoTarget and PRO-ACT databases.

Table 3 Standardized times in PatientsLikeMe, LiCALS, MitoTarget and PRO-ACT databases in limb onset versus bulbar onset patients.