Figures & data
Figure 1. Segmentation of the SCAT layer from MRI scan: (from left to right) exterior geometry initialisation, segmented exterior geometry, segmented interior geometry, orthogonal slices of the segmented geometries.
![Figure 1. Segmentation of the SCAT layer from MRI scan: (from left to right) exterior geometry initialisation, segmented exterior geometry, segmented interior geometry, orthogonal slices of the segmented geometries.](/cms/asset/36931422-ff62-46c3-acdd-efcfc5a0efa6/tciv_a_1163508_f0001_oc.jpg)
Figure 2. The axial slices of the segmented geometries of the subcutaneous fat layer from MRI data-set of BMI 23 using the proposed model.
![Figure 2. The axial slices of the segmented geometries of the subcutaneous fat layer from MRI data-set of BMI 23 using the proposed model.](/cms/asset/c08e2b4a-5431-494d-b522-cfda46ade24c/tciv_a_1163508_f0002_oc.jpg)
Figure 3. Segmentation of the subcutaneous fat layer from MRI scans (from left to right, increasing BMIs 19, 22, 23, 25, 35): the top row depicting coronal slices, and the bottom row depicting the manually labelled slices (yellow) and the corresponding axial slices segmented (orange) using the proposed model.
![Figure 3. Segmentation of the subcutaneous fat layer from MRI scans (from left to right, increasing BMIs 19, 22, 23, 25, 35): the top row depicting coronal slices, and the bottom row depicting the manually labelled slices (yellow) and the corresponding axial slices segmented (orange) using the proposed model.](/cms/asset/47189b71-f15e-46fc-a7a0-fed21986a259/tciv_a_1163508_f0003_oc.jpg)
Table 1. Comparison of the segmentation of SCAT of the different MRI data-sets using the proposed model to manual segmentation, depicting the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), sensitivity, specificity and overall accuracy of the segmented geometries (%).