Figures & data
Figure 1. Small EV collection, isolation, and characterization scheme. H, hypoxia; N, normoxia; MC, media control.
![Figure 1. Small EV collection, isolation, and characterization scheme. H, hypoxia; N, normoxia; MC, media control.](/cms/asset/5e29cebe-8142-4753-9d88-2f0a295d3902/ktib_a_2347062_f0001_oc.jpg)
Figure 2. Effect of different serum composition in media in ThinCert® insert model. (a) Schematic representation of an insert with indicated apical and basolateral compartment and experimental workflow to obtain the HTB-41 B2 SSGB model. Media used for treatment on apical (a) and basolateral (b) side of the insert was either serum free, supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), or 10% sEV depleted FBS. Effects of different media composition were recorded with a CellZscope device for continuous monitoring, where (b) transepithelial electrical resistance (TER) and (c) capacitance of cell layers (CAP) were measured in 1 h intervals. Data were normalized to the timepoint 1 h after sEV addition. (b,c) data are represented as mean ± SEM, N = 3–5, n = 5–14. In table S3 (TER) and table S4 (CAP) statistically significant differences for all conditions are listed.
![Figure 2. Effect of different serum composition in media in ThinCert® insert model. (a) Schematic representation of an insert with indicated apical and basolateral compartment and experimental workflow to obtain the HTB-41 B2 SSGB model. Media used for treatment on apical (a) and basolateral (b) side of the insert was either serum free, supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), or 10% sEV depleted FBS. Effects of different media composition were recorded with a CellZscope device for continuous monitoring, where (b) transepithelial electrical resistance (TER) and (c) capacitance of cell layers (CAP) were measured in 1 h intervals. Data were normalized to the timepoint 1 h after sEV addition. (b,c) data are represented as mean ± SEM, N = 3–5, n = 5–14. In table S3 (TER) and table S4 (CAP) statistically significant differences for all conditions are listed.](/cms/asset/f9c7e035-01e9-4a47-bb69-48fd71db9746/ktib_a_2347062_f0002_oc.jpg)
Figure 3. Characterization of sEvs derived from DU145 cells in hypoxic (H) − 1% O2 or normoxic (N) – atmospheric O2 conditions. Shown are representative graphs of (a) size distribution with indicated median (M (size)) and (b) zeta potential with indicated mean ZP (M (ZP)) of H and N sEvs measured with nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA). c) cryo-TEM image of DU145 N sEvs. Scale bar = 100 nm. (d) Western blot analysis confirmed the presence of β-actin, sEV enriched (Alix, CD9, CD81) and absence of a sEV negative marker (GM130), as well as hypoxia regulated phosphorylation of ERK1/2. (e) Relative levels of ERK proteins were calculated as described in 2.11. N = 3 of pooled samples, n = 3 ± SEM.
![Figure 3. Characterization of sEvs derived from DU145 cells in hypoxic (H) − 1% O2 or normoxic (N) – atmospheric O2 conditions. Shown are representative graphs of (a) size distribution with indicated median (M (size)) and (b) zeta potential with indicated mean ZP (M (ZP)) of H and N sEvs measured with nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA). c) cryo-TEM image of DU145 N sEvs. Scale bar = 100 nm. (d) Western blot analysis confirmed the presence of β-actin, sEV enriched (Alix, CD9, CD81) and absence of a sEV negative marker (GM130), as well as hypoxia regulated phosphorylation of ERK1/2. (e) Relative levels of ERK proteins were calculated as described in 2.11. N = 3 of pooled samples, n = 3 ± SEM.](/cms/asset/0be4f93d-cef8-4337-8a70-d84f1462fa8f/ktib_a_2347062_f0003_oc.jpg)
Figure 4. Barrier integrity after addition of DU145 sEvs on the basolateral side of the SSGB model (HTB-41 clone B2 cells on ThinCerts®). On the apical (salivary) side, media without serum were used, on the basolateral (blood) side either media with 10% FBS (a) or serum-free (b) media were applied. Transepithelial electrical resistance (TER) and capacitance of the cell layer (CAP) were recorded using a CellZscope device. Data normalized to data 1 h after media change (a,b) are shown as mean values ± SEM. N = 3–4, n = 8–12. Significant differences were observed between basolateral FBS vs. serum-free conditions, whereas sEV treatment exhibited no statically different effects. Significant differences are listed in table S5 (TER) and table S6 (CAP).
![Figure 4. Barrier integrity after addition of DU145 sEvs on the basolateral side of the SSGB model (HTB-41 clone B2 cells on ThinCerts®). On the apical (salivary) side, media without serum were used, on the basolateral (blood) side either media with 10% FBS (a) or serum-free (b) media were applied. Transepithelial electrical resistance (TER) and capacitance of the cell layer (CAP) were recorded using a CellZscope device. Data normalized to data 1 h after media change (a,b) are shown as mean values ± SEM. N = 3–4, n = 8–12. Significant differences were observed between basolateral FBS vs. serum-free conditions, whereas sEV treatment exhibited no statically different effects. Significant differences are listed in table S5 (TER) and table S6 (CAP).](/cms/asset/8fb736be-1cf8-40a9-a89e-86b59c109054/ktib_a_2347062_f0004_oc.jpg)
Figure 5. Changes at the molecular level after basolateral treatment of the SGGB model with H or N DU145 sEvs in serum-free or 10% FBS supplemented medium. (a) for the same samples mRNA expression of selected targets in HTB-41 clone B2 barrier after treatment with H or N DU145 sEvs for in either serum-free media or 10% FBS added basolaterally. n = 3, N = 3 pooled samples. Compressed legend. (b) Protein expression of E-cadherin, ZO-1, ß-actin and claudin-7 visualized by Western blotting. (c) Quantified protein expression levels of claudin-7, E-cadherin and zonula occludens-1 (ZO-1). Relative protein expression levels were determined by calculating relative density ratios to ß-actin and then normalized to 10% FBS control. Mean ± SEM, n = 3, N = 3 of pooled samples. E-cadherin expression between basolateral 10% FBS vs. serum-free control; p = 0.0439.
![Figure 5. Changes at the molecular level after basolateral treatment of the SGGB model with H or N DU145 sEvs in serum-free or 10% FBS supplemented medium. (a) for the same samples mRNA expression of selected targets in HTB-41 clone B2 barrier after treatment with H or N DU145 sEvs for in either serum-free media or 10% FBS added basolaterally. n = 3, N = 3 pooled samples. Compressed legend. (b) Protein expression of E-cadherin, ZO-1, ß-actin and claudin-7 visualized by Western blotting. (c) Quantified protein expression levels of claudin-7, E-cadherin and zonula occludens-1 (ZO-1). Relative protein expression levels were determined by calculating relative density ratios to ß-actin and then normalized to 10% FBS control. Mean ± SEM, n = 3, N = 3 of pooled samples. E-cadherin expression between basolateral 10% FBS vs. serum-free control; p = 0.0439.](/cms/asset/250c3502-8cf4-41c1-b68b-93fa2bfd52f7/ktib_a_2347062_f0005_oc.jpg)
Figure 6. Uptake of CTO labeled hypoxia derived (H) and normoxia derived (N) sEvs measured with flow cytometer after 40 h incubation. (a) sEV labeling scheme with CellTrackerTM orange. (b) uptake of CTO+ H and N sEvs. Mean ± SEM n = 9, N = 3. (c) size distribution of sEV particles in the apical compartment after treatment with either H or N sEvs from the basolateral side in different serum conditions basolaterally. Data are represented as an average of three measurements, n = 3–4, N = 3–4. (d,e) sEV particles measured in the apical compartment with nanoparticle tracking analyzer 40 h after treatment with either H or N sEvs in the basolateral compartment in (d) serum-free or (e) 10% FBS and serum-free apically. Apical media collected after incubation period was subjected to a series of centrifugation steps as described in 2.5 to deplete any cells, apoptotic bodies, or larger vesicles. Data was normalized to normoxic sEV treatment. (d) Mean ± SD n = 11, N = 4 of pooled samples. (e) Mean ± SD, n = 8, N = 3 of pooled samples. Data was analyzed with one-way ANOVA followed by pairwise Holm-Šidak’s multiple comparison post hoc tests, (d) p = 0,0032, (e) p = 0.0056.
![Figure 6. Uptake of CTO labeled hypoxia derived (H) and normoxia derived (N) sEvs measured with flow cytometer after 40 h incubation. (a) sEV labeling scheme with CellTrackerTM orange. (b) uptake of CTO+ H and N sEvs. Mean ± SEM n = 9, N = 3. (c) size distribution of sEV particles in the apical compartment after treatment with either H or N sEvs from the basolateral side in different serum conditions basolaterally. Data are represented as an average of three measurements, n = 3–4, N = 3–4. (d,e) sEV particles measured in the apical compartment with nanoparticle tracking analyzer 40 h after treatment with either H or N sEvs in the basolateral compartment in (d) serum-free or (e) 10% FBS and serum-free apically. Apical media collected after incubation period was subjected to a series of centrifugation steps as described in 2.5 to deplete any cells, apoptotic bodies, or larger vesicles. Data was normalized to normoxic sEV treatment. (d) Mean ± SD n = 11, N = 4 of pooled samples. (e) Mean ± SD, n = 8, N = 3 of pooled samples. Data was analyzed with one-way ANOVA followed by pairwise Holm-Šidak’s multiple comparison post hoc tests, (d) p = 0,0032, (e) p = 0.0056.](/cms/asset/e9bf5c47-dce9-4a6a-b906-500a61113e99/ktib_a_2347062_f0006_oc.jpg)