2,427
Views
37
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Pharmacokinetics and in vitro and in vivo delivery of sulforaphane by PCL–PEG–PCL copolymeric-based micelles

, , &
Pages 1728-1739 | Received 06 Sep 2016, Accepted 30 Dec 2016, Published online: 01 Feb 2017

Figures & data

Table 1. Molecular characterics of the synthesized copolymers.

Figure 1. (a) AFM image of SF-loaded spherical core shell micelles; (b) particle size distribution; (c) zeta potential.

Figure 1. (a) AFM image of SF-loaded spherical core shell micelles; (b) particle size distribution; (c) zeta potential.

Table 2. Properties of SF-loaded PCL–PEG–PCL micelles.

Table 3. Characterisistic of micelles from the synthesized copolymers.

Figure 2. (a) The release profiles of SF from SF-PCL–PEG–PCL micelles in different release media. (b) The release profiles of SF from SF-PCL–PEG–PCL micelles in different copolymers composition.

Figure 2. (a) The release profiles of SF from SF-PCL–PEG–PCL micelles in different release media. (b) The release profiles of SF from SF-PCL–PEG–PCL micelles in different copolymers composition.

Figure 3. Cytotoxicity of free SF, PCL–PEG–PCL micelles and SF-loaded micelle against MCF-7, MCF10A and 4T1 cells. The cells were incubated with SF-loaded micelle (SF concentration 1–30 μmol/L) for 48 and 72 h at 37° C each bar represents the mean of five measurements ± SD.

Figure 3. Cytotoxicity of free SF, PCL–PEG–PCL micelles and SF-loaded micelle against MCF-7, MCF10A and 4T1 cells. The cells were incubated with SF-loaded micelle (SF concentration 1–30 μmol/L) for 48 and 72 h at 37° C each bar represents the mean of five measurements ± SD.

Figure 4. (a) Statistical analysis of flow cytometry results show total apoptosis and live cell percentages in 4T1 cells. The values represent mean ± SD. *P < 0.0001, #P < 0.0001, and +P < 0.0001 indicate significant difference between PCL–PEG–PCL, free SF, and SF/PCL–PEG–PCL, respectively. (b) The apoptosis induction by SF at [PCL–PEG–PCL] micelles (D), free SF (C), [PCL–PEG–PCL] Micelles (B) and negative control (PBS) (A) on 4T1 cell line.

Figure 4. (a) Statistical analysis of flow cytometry results show total apoptosis and live cell percentages in 4T1 cells. The values represent mean ± SD. *P < 0.0001, #P < 0.0001, and +P < 0.0001 indicate significant difference between PCL–PEG–PCL, free SF, and SF/PCL–PEG–PCL, respectively. (b) The apoptosis induction by SF at [PCL–PEG–PCL] micelles (D), free SF (C), [PCL–PEG–PCL] Micelles (B) and negative control (PBS) (A) on 4T1 cell line.

Figure 5. (a) Statistic analysis of gene expression in MCF-7 cells after 48 h treatments with 20 μmol/L of free SF, PCL–PEG–PCL micelles and SF loaded PCL–PEG–PCL. Each experiment was repeated three times. (b) Effects of PCL–PEG–PCL micelle and SF-loaded PCL–PEG–PCL micelle on the level of nitric oxide in NR8383 cells. Data represents the mean ± standard error of The mean of four experiments (P < 0.01 is significantly different from the LPS); (c) Hemolytic test on PCL–PEG–PCL micelle and SF-loaded PCL–PEG–PCL micelle. Data represent the mean ± standard error of the mean of three experiments (P < 0.01 compared to saline group); (d) Antitumor effect of free SF, PCL–PEG–PCL micelles and SF-loaded PCL–PEG–PCL in 4T1 tumor bearing mice. Mice were administered free SF (•) and SF-loaded micelle (▪) andPBS (▴) i.v at the equivalent 30 mg/kg SF.

Figure 5. (a) Statistic analysis of gene expression in MCF-7 cells after 48 h treatments with 20 μmol/L of free SF, PCL–PEG–PCL micelles and SF loaded PCL–PEG–PCL. Each experiment was repeated three times. (b) Effects of PCL–PEG–PCL micelle and SF-loaded PCL–PEG–PCL micelle on the level of nitric oxide in NR8383 cells. Data represents the mean ± standard error of The mean of four experiments (P < 0.01 is significantly different from the LPS); (c) Hemolytic test on PCL–PEG–PCL micelle and SF-loaded PCL–PEG–PCL micelle. Data represent the mean ± standard error of the mean of three experiments (P < 0.01 compared to saline group); (d) Antitumor effect of free SF, PCL–PEG–PCL micelles and SF-loaded PCL–PEG–PCL in 4T1 tumor bearing mice. Mice were administered free SF (•) and SF-loaded micelle (▪) andPBS (▴) i.v at the equivalent 30 mg/kg SF.

Figure 6. Comparison of in vivo plasma concentration vs. time profiles of the different SF formulations. All values reported are the mean ± SD (n = 5).

Figure 6. Comparison of in vivo plasma concentration vs. time profiles of the different SF formulations. All values reported are the mean ± SD (n = 5).

Table 4. Pharmacokinetic parameters of SF following single oral administration of SF aqueous solution and SF-loaded micelles, in rats (n = 5).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.