2,636
Views
51
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

In vitro and in vivo delivery of artemisinin loaded PCL–PEG–PCL micelles and its pharmacokinetic study

, , , &
Pages 926-936 | Received 06 Apr 2017, Accepted 24 Jun 2017, Published online: 07 Jul 2017

Figures & data

Figure 1. HNMR spectrum of PCL–PEG–PCL copolymer.

Figure 1. HNMR spectrum of PCL–PEG–PCL copolymer.

Figure 2. FT-IR spectrum of PCL–PEG–PCL copolymer.

Figure 2. FT-IR spectrum of PCL–PEG–PCL copolymer.

Figure 3. DSC thermogram of PCL–PEG–PCL copolymer.

Figure 3. DSC thermogram of PCL–PEG–PCL copolymer.

Table 1. Molecular characteristics of the synthesized copolymers.

Figure 4. AFM image of ART loaded spherical core shell micelles.

Figure 4. AFM image of ART loaded spherical core shell micelles.

Figure 5. Particle size distribution and zeta potential of ART/PCL–PEG–PCL.

Figure 5. Particle size distribution and zeta potential of ART/PCL–PEG–PCL.

Table 2. Properties of ART/PCL–PEG–PCL micelles.

Figure 6. The average hydrodynamic diameter of PCL–PEG–PCL copolymer.

Figure 6. The average hydrodynamic diameter of PCL–PEG–PCL copolymer.

Figure 7. The release profiles of ART from ART/PCL–PEG–PCL micelles in different release media (pH = 7.4, plasma, pH = 5.5).

Figure 7. The release profiles of ART from ART/PCL–PEG–PCL micelles in different release media (pH = 7.4, plasma, pH = 5.5).

Figure 8. MTT Assay of ART, polymer, ART/micelles and control (PBS) on (a) 4T1 cell line after 48 h; (b) 4T1 after 72 h (c) MCF7 after 48 h and (d) MCF7 after 72 h.

Figure 8. MTT Assay of ART, polymer, ART/micelles and control (PBS) on (a) 4T1 cell line after 48 h; (b) 4T1 after 72 h (c) MCF7 after 48 h and (d) MCF7 after 72 h.

Figure 9. Effect of ART, polymer, ART/micelles and control (PBS) on the evolution of tumour volume in mice.

Figure 9. Effect of ART, polymer, ART/micelles and control (PBS) on the evolution of tumour volume in mice.

Figure 10. Body weight measurements of mice (seven per group) bearing 4T1 allografts which treated with fifteen intravenous injections, every other day, of ART 60 mg/kg, PCL–PEG–PCL, ART/PCL–PEG–PCL (60 mg ART/kg) and PBS (control).

Figure 10. Body weight measurements of mice (seven per group) bearing 4T1 allografts which treated with fifteen intravenous injections, every other day, of ART 60 mg/kg, PCL–PEG–PCL, ART/PCL–PEG–PCL (60 mg ART/kg) and PBS (control).

Figure 11. Comparison of in vivo plasma concentration versus time profiles of the different. ART formulations. All values reported are the mean ± SD (n = 7).

Figure 11. Comparison of in vivo plasma concentration versus time profiles of the different. ART formulations. All values reported are the mean ± SD (n = 7).

Table 3. Pharmacokinetic parameters of ART following single dose injection of ART aqueous solution and ART/micelles, in rats (n = 7).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.