2,374
Views
49
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Mesoporous silica nanorods for improved oral drug absorption

, , , , &
Pages 1132-1140 | Received 13 Apr 2017, Accepted 27 Jul 2017, Published online: 08 Aug 2017

Figures & data

Figure 1. Characterization of MSNs. (a) TEM images of the MSNS1, MSNS2 and MSNRs. (b) Particle size of MSNS1 (∼90 nm), MSNS2 (∼190 nm) and MSNRs (∼200 nm). (c) Zeta potential of MSNS1, MSNS2 and MSNRs. Data are presented as the mean ± standard error of the mean (n = 3).

Figure 1. Characterization of MSNs. (a) TEM images of the MSNS1, MSNS2 and MSNRs. (b) Particle size of MSNS1 (∼90 nm), MSNS2 (∼190 nm) and MSNRs (∼200 nm). (c) Zeta potential of MSNS1, MSNS2 and MSNRs. Data are presented as the mean ± standard error of the mean (n = 3).

Figure 2. (a) Viability of Caco-2 cells after incubation with MSNRs or MSNSs for 24 h. (b) The MFI of FITC labelled MSNRs and MSNSs was measured by FACS in Caco-2 cells after treatment for 0.5, 1 and 2 h, respectively. (c) Confocal microscopy images of Caco-2 cells after treatment with FITC labelled MSNRs and MSNSs for 2 h. Scale bar represents 50 μm. (d) Cellular uptake mechanism of MSNRs and MSNSs. The data are presented as the mean ± standard error of the mean (n = 3). *p < .05 compared to control group; **p < .01 compared to control group.

Figure 2. (a) Viability of Caco-2 cells after incubation with MSNRs or MSNSs for 24 h. (b) The MFI of FITC labelled MSNRs and MSNSs was measured by FACS in Caco-2 cells after treatment for 0.5, 1 and 2 h, respectively. (c) Confocal microscopy images of Caco-2 cells after treatment with FITC labelled MSNRs and MSNSs for 2 h. Scale bar represents 50 μm. (d) Cellular uptake mechanism of MSNRs and MSNSs. The data are presented as the mean ± standard error of the mean (n = 3). *p < .05 compared to control group; **p < .01 compared to control group.

Figure 3. (a) LSCM images of Caco-2 cells after treatment with Dox formulations. Scale bar represents 20 μm. The white arrow indicated the drug delivered to nuclei. (b) Three-dimensional images of cellular internalization of Dox in Caco-2 cell monolayer. Scale bar represents 30 μm.

Figure 3. (a) LSCM images of Caco-2 cells after treatment with Dox formulations. Scale bar represents 20 μm. The white arrow indicated the drug delivered to nuclei. (b) Three-dimensional images of cellular internalization of Dox in Caco-2 cell monolayer. Scale bar represents 30 μm.

Table 1. Permeability value for MSNRs-Dox, MSNS1-Dox, MSNS2-Dox and Dox solution transported through Caco-2 cells.

Figure 4. LSCM images of Dox absorption at intestinal tissue with DAPI used to stain cell nucleus.

Figure 4. LSCM images of Dox absorption at intestinal tissue with DAPI used to stain cell nucleus.

Figure 5. Plasma concentration vs time profile of different Dox formulations after oral administration (n = 3).

Figure 5. Plasma concentration vs time profile of different Dox formulations after oral administration (n = 3).

Table 2. Pharmacokinetic parameters of Dox after oral administration of different Dox formulations at a dose of 10 mg/kg to rats (n = 3).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.