Figures & data
Figure 1. Dose–response relationship between hyaluronan and TGF-β1. The morphology of NECs changes from polygonal to irregular, detached and even aggregative shape with incubation of TGF-β1 (B–E). Scale bar =100 μm. Cell viability (F). RT-qPCR of FOXJ1 and E-cadherin under 5 ng/ml TGF-β1 plus various concentration of hyaluronan ranges from 0 mg/ml to 3 mg/ml (G, H). Results are expressed as the mean ± SD. Different letters (a, b) indicate a significant difference (p < .05), while the same letter indicates no significant difference (p > .05).
![Figure 1. Dose–response relationship between hyaluronan and TGF-β1. The morphology of NECs changes from polygonal to irregular, detached and even aggregative shape with incubation of TGF-β1 (B–E). Scale bar =100 μm. Cell viability (F). RT-qPCR of FOXJ1 and E-cadherin under 5 ng/ml TGF-β1 plus various concentration of hyaluronan ranges from 0 mg/ml to 3 mg/ml (G, H). Results are expressed as the mean ± SD. Different letters (a, b) indicate a significant difference (p < .05), while the same letter indicates no significant difference (p > .05).](/cms/asset/d9059496-fb1e-42ad-90e0-bb7268df25f6/ianb_a_1491477_f0001_b.jpg)
Figure 2. Morphology of NECs treated with TGF-β1 (5 ng/ml), TGF-β1 plus hyaluronan (2 mg/ml) and hyaluronan (A–D). Scale bar = 100 μm. Scanning electron micrographs (magnification ×2000) (E–H). TER is measured and normalized to controls (I). Results are expressed as the mean ± SD. Different letters (a, b) indicate a significant difference (p<.05), while the same letter indicates no significant difference (p>.05). TER: transepithelial electrical resistance.
![Figure 2. Morphology of NECs treated with TGF-β1 (5 ng/ml), TGF-β1 plus hyaluronan (2 mg/ml) and hyaluronan (A–D). Scale bar = 100 μm. Scanning electron micrographs (magnification ×2000) (E–H). TER is measured and normalized to controls (I). Results are expressed as the mean ± SD. Different letters (a, b) indicate a significant difference (p<.05), while the same letter indicates no significant difference (p>.05). TER: transepithelial electrical resistance.](/cms/asset/68994e2f-dc0b-49d3-baf2-00289a11f89f/ianb_a_1491477_f0002_b.jpg)
Figure 3. Immunofluorescent confocal images of ZO-1 (A–D), E-cadherin (E–H), N-cadherin (I–L) and vimentin (M–P) in NECs (H–J) are shown. Cellular cytoskeletal shape (F-actin) is outlined by rhodamine phalloidin. Nuclei are labelled with DAPI. Scale bar = 20 μm.
![Figure 3. Immunofluorescent confocal images of ZO-1 (A–D), E-cadherin (E–H), N-cadherin (I–L) and vimentin (M–P) in NECs (H–J) are shown. Cellular cytoskeletal shape (F-actin) is outlined by rhodamine phalloidin. Nuclei are labelled with DAPI. Scale bar = 20 μm.](/cms/asset/fb03a6b1-647f-422e-9083-4f36f62aa4cd/ianb_a_1491477_f0003_c.jpg)
Figure 4. Western blot analyses of ZO-1, E-cadherin, N-cadherin and vimentin (A) in NECs treated with TGF-β1, TGF-β1 plus hyaluronan or hyaluronan. Densitometric analyses are shown (B–E). Results are expressed as the mean ± SD and significant differences are indicated by different letters (p< .05).
![Figure 4. Western blot analyses of ZO-1, E-cadherin, N-cadherin and vimentin (A) in NECs treated with TGF-β1, TGF-β1 plus hyaluronan or hyaluronan. Densitometric analyses are shown (B–E). Results are expressed as the mean ± SD and significant differences are indicated by different letters (p< .05).](/cms/asset/e5343c18-65fa-4675-8336-3c6376999a94/ianb_a_1491477_f0004_b.jpg)
Figure 5. Observations of cilia using scanning electron micrographs (magnification ×15,000, scale bar = 3 μm) (A–D) and immunofluorescent confocal images of acetylated tubulin (E–H). Cellular cytoskeletal shape (F-actin) is outlined by rhodamine phalloidin. Nuclei are labelled with DAPI. Scale bar = 20 μm. Western blots and densitometric analyses of acetylated tubulin/GAPDH ratios are shown (I). Results are expressed as the mean ± SD and significant differences are indicated by different letters (p < .05).
![Figure 5. Observations of cilia using scanning electron micrographs (magnification ×15,000, scale bar = 3 μm) (A–D) and immunofluorescent confocal images of acetylated tubulin (E–H). Cellular cytoskeletal shape (F-actin) is outlined by rhodamine phalloidin. Nuclei are labelled with DAPI. Scale bar = 20 μm. Western blots and densitometric analyses of acetylated tubulin/GAPDH ratios are shown (I). Results are expressed as the mean ± SD and significant differences are indicated by different letters (p < .05).](/cms/asset/d727b0ed-4038-42f5-95c5-840f0fefbe6e/ianb_a_1491477_f0005_c.jpg)
Figure 6. Mucin-secreting cells are virtualized using immunofluorescent confocal images of MUC5AC (A–D) and evaluated by western blots at day 21 after confluence. Cellular cytoskeletal shape (F-actin) is outlined by rhodamine phalloidin. Nuclei are labelled with DAPI. Scale bar = 20 μm. Densitometric analysis of MUC5AC/GAPDH ratios is shown (E, bottom). Results are expressed as the mean ± SD and significant differences are indicated by different letters (p < .05).
![Figure 6. Mucin-secreting cells are virtualized using immunofluorescent confocal images of MUC5AC (A–D) and evaluated by western blots at day 21 after confluence. Cellular cytoskeletal shape (F-actin) is outlined by rhodamine phalloidin. Nuclei are labelled with DAPI. Scale bar = 20 μm. Densitometric analysis of MUC5AC/GAPDH ratios is shown (E, bottom). Results are expressed as the mean ± SD and significant differences are indicated by different letters (p < .05).](/cms/asset/576cfedf-1e12-4b24-9a4e-5280fdc057e7/ianb_a_1491477_f0006_c.jpg)
Figure 7. Hyaluronan down-regulates phosphorylation of TβR1 and reduces TGF-β/Smad signalling of NECs. Phospho-TβR1, TβR1, phospho-TβR2, TβR2, phospho-Smad2, phospho-Smad3 and Smad2/3 expression are examined by western blot analyses (A). Densitometric analysis is shown (B–E). Results are expressed as the mean ± SD and significant differences are indicated by different letters (p < .05). TβR1: type 1 transforming growth factor receptor. TβRII: type 2 transforming growth factor receptor.
![Figure 7. Hyaluronan down-regulates phosphorylation of TβR1 and reduces TGF-β/Smad signalling of NECs. Phospho-TβR1, TβR1, phospho-TβR2, TβR2, phospho-Smad2, phospho-Smad3 and Smad2/3 expression are examined by western blot analyses (A). Densitometric analysis is shown (B–E). Results are expressed as the mean ± SD and significant differences are indicated by different letters (p < .05). TβR1: type 1 transforming growth factor receptor. TβRII: type 2 transforming growth factor receptor.](/cms/asset/c3505df3-e6c6-41ed-adc0-7e78f2e4a57f/ianb_a_1491477_f0007_b.jpg)
Figure 8. Hyaluronan-mediated down-regulation of phosphorylation of TβR1 is prevented with blocking antibodies to CD44. CD44, phospho-TβR1 and TβR1 expressions are examined by western blot analyses (A). Densitometric analysis is shown (B). Results are expressed as the mean ± SD and significant differences are indicated by asterisk (p< .05). α-CD44: blocking antibodies to CD44. TβR1: type 1 transforming growth factor receptor.
![Figure 8. Hyaluronan-mediated down-regulation of phosphorylation of TβR1 is prevented with blocking antibodies to CD44. CD44, phospho-TβR1 and TβR1 expressions are examined by western blot analyses (A). Densitometric analysis is shown (B). Results are expressed as the mean ± SD and significant differences are indicated by asterisk (p< .05). α-CD44: blocking antibodies to CD44. TβR1: type 1 transforming growth factor receptor.](/cms/asset/10ee552a-b1b0-4307-a22e-0412e4397758/ianb_a_1491477_f0008_b.jpg)