Figures & data
Figure 1. Simulation and optimisation framework (Iriondo Pascual et al., Citation2021).
![Figure 1. Simulation and optimisation framework (Iriondo Pascual et al., Citation2021).](/cms/asset/4875144d-a8ee-4956-a398-af16ee6a3bd7/tpmr_a_2323484_f0001_b.gif)
Figure 2. Current original solution of the logistics area represented by green box (left), zoomed in (right).
![Figure 2. Current original solution of the logistics area represented by green box (left), zoomed in (right).](/cms/asset/74e73043-e498-4c4c-a49b-85a10636ff7e/tpmr_a_2323484_f0002_oc.jpg)
Figure 7. The original solution not fulfilling the safety distance requirements of the tugger train path.
![Figure 7. The original solution not fulfilling the safety distance requirements of the tugger train path.](/cms/asset/bacae101-b14a-4e11-995c-151cdc1d905e/tpmr_a_2323484_f0007_oc.jpg)
Table 1. Lundqvist Index factor with classification according to Höldrich (Citation2011).
Table 2. Configuration of the optimisation algorithm operators.
Table 3. Values of the three objectives for the solutions in the pareto front, compared with values of the original solution.