Figures & data
Figure 1. Serological investigation of SARS-CoV-2 in food workers in Wuhan. (A) Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) screening of SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein (NP) IgG antibodies (n=508 subjects). The cutoff (dashed line) was five times the mean value of negative samples. Serum samples from healthy donors were used as the control (n=30). (B) Same ELISA test using a commercial kit. (C) NP IgG antibody levels in two consecutive serological tests (n=21).
![Figure 1. Serological investigation of SARS-CoV-2 in food workers in Wuhan. (A) Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) screening of SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein (NP) IgG antibodies (n=508 subjects). The cutoff (dashed line) was five times the mean value of negative samples. Serum samples from healthy donors were used as the control (n=30). (B) Same ELISA test using a commercial kit. (C) NP IgG antibody levels in two consecutive serological tests (n=21).](/cms/asset/3990f1d6-6473-4e18-87fb-9a5cca6fbe27/temi_a_1919032_f0001_oc.jpg)
Figure 2. Phylogenetic tree of SARS-CoV-2 genomes. Three full-length genomes were obtained from three asymptomatic subjects collected on May 30 (AP43) or June 1 (AP44 and AP45) 2020 and were clustered with 1,927 publicly available representative genomes downloaded from the GISAID database. Sampling time is indicated at the end of each genome.
![Figure 2. Phylogenetic tree of SARS-CoV-2 genomes. Three full-length genomes were obtained from three asymptomatic subjects collected on May 30 (AP43) or June 1 (AP44 and AP45) 2020 and were clustered with 1,927 publicly available representative genomes downloaded from the GISAID database. Sampling time is indicated at the end of each genome.](/cms/asset/dc9430bf-8e97-471d-8fde-f3ffa569f7ef/temi_a_1919032_f0002_oc.jpg)
Figure 3. Asymptomatic subjects exhibit a weak serological response. (A, B) Comparison of IgG_RBD (A) and IgM_RBD (B) between asymptomatic subjects (n=24) and recovered symptomatic patients (n=60). Serum samples from healthy donors were used as controls (n=20). The median values are shown. Statistical significance was calculated using an unpaired Student’s t-test, **P < 0.01; ****P < 0.0001. (C) Neutralizing titers of selected serum samples from asymptomatic and symptomatic patients. IgG_RBD ELISA values and neutralizing antibody (nAb) titers are shown. The titer was tested using surrogate neutralization assays, shown as inhibition ratio (column C).
![Figure 3. Asymptomatic subjects exhibit a weak serological response. (A, B) Comparison of IgG_RBD (A) and IgM_RBD (B) between asymptomatic subjects (n=24) and recovered symptomatic patients (n=60). Serum samples from healthy donors were used as controls (n=20). The median values are shown. Statistical significance was calculated using an unpaired Student’s t-test, **P < 0.01; ****P < 0.0001. (C) Neutralizing titers of selected serum samples from asymptomatic and symptomatic patients. IgG_RBD ELISA values and neutralizing antibody (nAb) titers are shown. The titer was tested using surrogate neutralization assays, shown as inhibition ratio (column C).](/cms/asset/760ec465-39d8-4ac7-a1be-97f13277196e/temi_a_1919032_f0003_ob.jpg)
Figure 4. Lymphocyte ratio and signature cytokine levels in blood. (A) Flow-cytometric analysis of major lymphocyte populations in peripheral blood cells (PBCs) in asymptomatic subjects (n=10), 2-month recovered symptomatic patients (n=5), symptomatic acute infection (n=9) and healthy individuals (n=8). Data are shown as percentages of PBCs. (B) Comparison of blood IL-6 (left) and TNF-α (right) concentrations between asymptomatic subjects (n=15), 2-month recovered symptomatic patients (n=14), and symptomatic acute infection (n=14) or healthy donors (n=7). Human sera were used at 1:4 as recommended by the ELISA kit manufacturer. Mann-Whitney tests were used. Means ± SDs are shown. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001; ns, no significance.
![Figure 4. Lymphocyte ratio and signature cytokine levels in blood. (A) Flow-cytometric analysis of major lymphocyte populations in peripheral blood cells (PBCs) in asymptomatic subjects (n=10), 2-month recovered symptomatic patients (n=5), symptomatic acute infection (n=9) and healthy individuals (n=8). Data are shown as percentages of PBCs. (B) Comparison of blood IL-6 (left) and TNF-α (right) concentrations between asymptomatic subjects (n=15), 2-month recovered symptomatic patients (n=14), and symptomatic acute infection (n=14) or healthy donors (n=7). Human sera were used at 1:4 as recommended by the ELISA kit manufacturer. Mann-Whitney tests were used. Means ± SDs are shown. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001; ns, no significance.](/cms/asset/a42b81e3-c4bd-4b13-be0c-b92c45812f2a/temi_a_1919032_f0004_oc.jpg)
Figure 5. Frequency of CD3−CD19+CD27hiCD38hi antibody-secreting cells (ASCs). (A) Gating strategy for ASCs in flow cytometry. (B) Frequency of ASCs in asymptomatic subjects (n=10), compared to that in recovered symptomatic individuals (positive control, n=2) or healthy donors (negative control, n=2).
![Figure 5. Frequency of CD3−CD19+CD27hiCD38hi antibody-secreting cells (ASCs). (A) Gating strategy for ASCs in flow cytometry. (B) Frequency of ASCs in asymptomatic subjects (n=10), compared to that in recovered symptomatic individuals (positive control, n=2) or healthy donors (negative control, n=2).](/cms/asset/2a20e404-26f4-4d0c-b11d-9d1e9d6e9670/temi_a_1919032_f0005_oc.jpg)