Figures & data
Figure 3. Injection of BTX-A were given near the neurovascular bundle at the A1-A5 pulley at the basis of digit 1–5 in the palm of the hand.
![Figure 3. Injection of BTX-A were given near the neurovascular bundle at the A1-A5 pulley at the basis of digit 1–5 in the palm of the hand.](/cms/asset/59f1bdae-22fa-43d0-9cd9-1b1f1955db25/zich_a_2189556_f0003_oc.jpg)
Table 1. Clinical data from the pilot study.
Figure 4. Thermographic images from patient 1 exemplify the rewarming of the dorsal side of the hands at 6 months follow-up encompassed a pre-cooling phase (T1), a cooling phase with hands immersed in water for one minute (T2), and a four-minute recovery phase (T3, T4, T5 and T6) demonstrated by Dynamic Infrared Thermography.
![Figure 4. Thermographic images from patient 1 exemplify the rewarming of the dorsal side of the hands at 6 months follow-up encompassed a pre-cooling phase (T1), a cooling phase with hands immersed in water for one minute (T2), and a four-minute recovery phase (T3, T4, T5 and T6) demonstrated by Dynamic Infrared Thermography.](/cms/asset/5b355f99-2e04-40a0-937a-c9c3416dce26/zich_a_2189556_f0004_oc.jpg)
Figure 5. Mean hand skin temperature versus time demonstrated in patient 3 with Dynamic Infrared Thermography (DIRT) at four rounds (inclusion, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months) encompassed a pre-cooling phase (T1), a cooling phase with hands immersed in water for one minute (T2), and a four-minute recovery phase (T3, T4, T5 and T6).
![Figure 5. Mean hand skin temperature versus time demonstrated in patient 3 with Dynamic Infrared Thermography (DIRT) at four rounds (inclusion, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months) encompassed a pre-cooling phase (T1), a cooling phase with hands immersed in water for one minute (T2), and a four-minute recovery phase (T3, T4, T5 and T6).](/cms/asset/1508a60b-72fe-4e16-8f19-1ea6a8b21af6/zich_a_2189556_f0005_oc.jpg)
Figure 6. Quantitative sensory testing (QST) at the affected hand for all subjects over time. While the mechanical parameters are all within the confidence interval for age-corrected healthy subjects (dashed line − 95% confidence interval), there are impressive changes for the thermal detection thresholds, especially for the cold detection threshold (CDT). After therapy, these parameters returned in a direction towards normalization. WDT – warm detection threshold, TSL – thermal sensory limen, CPT – cold pain threshold, HPT – heat detection threshold, MDT – mechanical detection threshold, MPT – mechanical pain threshold, MPS – mechanical pain sensitivity, WUR – wind-up ratio, VDT – vibration detection threshold, PPT – pressure pain threshold; T1 – before intervention, T2–6 weeks, T3–12 weeks follow-up. QST-data were not obtained at 6 months follow-up.
![Figure 6. Quantitative sensory testing (QST) at the affected hand for all subjects over time. While the mechanical parameters are all within the confidence interval for age-corrected healthy subjects (dashed line − 95% confidence interval), there are impressive changes for the thermal detection thresholds, especially for the cold detection threshold (CDT). After therapy, these parameters returned in a direction towards normalization. WDT – warm detection threshold, TSL – thermal sensory limen, CPT – cold pain threshold, HPT – heat detection threshold, MDT – mechanical detection threshold, MPT – mechanical pain threshold, MPS – mechanical pain sensitivity, WUR – wind-up ratio, VDT – vibration detection threshold, PPT – pressure pain threshold; T1 – before intervention, T2–6 weeks, T3–12 weeks follow-up. QST-data were not obtained at 6 months follow-up.](/cms/asset/e965cfdf-53d5-4c1e-9ff1-c27ba99b8a83/zich_a_2189556_f0006_oc.jpg)
Table 2. Mean difference of change in mean PSSS between the groups, standard deviation of the difference and threshold (Δ/2) for indication of effect of the between group difference. Further research is not recommended since the difference in score is lower than Δ/2.