Advanced search
Publication Cover
European Journal of Remote Sensing Volume 53, 2020 - Issue 1
Submit an article Journal homepage
1,777
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Evaluation of the influence of disturbances on forest vegetation using Landsat time series; a case study of the Low Tatras National Park

Radovan HladkyDepartment of Applied Geoinformatics and Cartography, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic;Administration of the Low Tatras National Park, State Nature Conservation of the Slovak Republic (NAPANT), Banska Bystrica, SlovakiaView further author information
,
Josef LastovickaDepartment of Applied Geoinformatics and Cartography, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech RepublicView further author information
,
Lukas HolmanDepartment of Applied Geoinformatics and Cartography, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech RepublicView further author information
&
Premysl StychDepartment of Applied Geoinformatics and Cartography, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech RepublicCorrespondence[email protected]
ORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-0307-9688View further author information
ORCID Icon
Pages 40-66 | Received 03 Mar 2019, Accepted 07 Jan 2020, Published online: 02 Mar 2020

Figures & data

Figure 1. Map of the sites of interest (source: own creation, ESRI data)

Figure 1. Map of the sites of interest (source: own creation, ESRI data)

Table 1. List of the used images (source: USGS)

Table 2. Description of the sites of interest (source: NAPANT)

Figure 2. The development of the individual monitored indices for the locality 1 affected by wind disturbance (red vertical line is the time of wind disturbance and blue line is the start of recovery mode) (source: own creation)

Figure 2. The development of the individual monitored indices for the locality 1 affected by wind disturbance (red vertical line is the time of wind disturbance and blue line is the start of recovery mode) (source: own creation)

Figure 3. The development of the individual monitored indices for the locality 2 affected by wind disturbance (red vertical line is the time of wind disturbance and blue line is the start of recovery mode) (source: own creation)

Figure 3. The development of the individual monitored indices for the locality 2 affected by wind disturbance (red vertical line is the time of wind disturbance and blue line is the start of recovery mode) (source: own creation)

Figure 4. The development of the individual monitored indices for the locality 3 affected by wind disturbance (red vertical line is the time of wind disturbance and blue line is the start of recovery mode) (source: own creation)

Figure 4. The development of the individual monitored indices for the locality 3 affected by wind disturbance (red vertical line is the time of wind disturbance and blue line is the start of recovery mode) (source: own creation)

Figure 5. The development of the individual monitored indices for the locality 4 affected by bark beetle disturbance (red vertical line is the start of bark beetle disturbance and blue line is the start of recovery mode) (source: own creation)

Figure 5. The development of the individual monitored indices for the locality 4 affected by bark beetle disturbance (red vertical line is the start of bark beetle disturbance and blue line is the start of recovery mode) (source: own creation)

Figure 6. The development of the individual monitored indices for the locality 5 affected by bark beetle disturbance (red vertical line is the start of bark beetle disturbance and blue line is the start of recovery mode) (source: own creation)

Figure 6. The development of the individual monitored indices for the locality 5 affected by bark beetle disturbance (red vertical line is the start of bark beetle disturbance and blue line is the start of recovery mode) (source: own creation)

Figure 7. The development of the individual monitored indices for the locality 6 affected by bark beetle disturbance (red vertical line is the start of bark beetle disturbance and blue line is the start of recovery mode) (source: own creation)

Figure 7. The development of the individual monitored indices for the locality 6 affected by bark beetle disturbance (red vertical line is the start of bark beetle disturbance and blue line is the start of recovery mode) (source: own creation)

Figure 8. The development of the individual monitored indices for the locality 7 without disturbance (source: own creation)

Figure 8. The development of the individual monitored indices for the locality 7 without disturbance (source: own creation)

Figure 9. The development of the individual monitored indices for the locality 8 without disturbance (source: own creation)

Figure 9. The development of the individual monitored indices for the locality 8 without disturbance (source: own creation)

Figure 10. The development of the individual monitored indices for the locality 9 without disturbance (source: own creation)

Figure 10. The development of the individual monitored indices for the locality 9 without disturbance (source: own creation)

Table 3. Description of the locality 1 (source: LGIS National Forest Center, GIS S-NAPANT)

Figure 11. Aerial photographs of the locality 1 from years 2005, 2009 and 2018 (source: NAPANT, own creation)

Figure 11. Aerial photographs of the locality 1 from years 2005, 2009 and 2018 (source: NAPANT, own creation)

Figure 12. Photo of the locality 1 (source: own creation)

Figure 12. Photo of the locality 1 (source: own creation)

Table 4. Description of the locality 2 (source: LGIS National Forest Center, GIS S-NAPANT)

Figure 13. Aerial photographs of the locality 2 from years 2005, 2009 and 2018 (source: NAPANT, own creation)

Figure 13. Aerial photographs of the locality 2 from years 2005, 2009 and 2018 (source: NAPANT, own creation)

Figure 14. Photo of the locality 2 (source: own creation)

Figure 14. Photo of the locality 2 (source: own creation)

Table 5. Description of the locality 3 (source: LGIS National Forest Center, GIS S-NAPANT)

Figure 15. Aerial photographs of the locality 3 from years 2005, 2009 and 2018 (source: NAPANT, own creation)

Figure 15. Aerial photographs of the locality 3 from years 2005, 2009 and 2018 (source: NAPANT, own creation)

Figure 16. Photo of the locality 3 (source: own creation)

Figure 16. Photo of the locality 3 (source: own creation)

Table 6. Description of the locality 4 (source: LGIS National Forest Center, GIS S-NAPANT)

Figure 17. Aerial photographs of the locality 4 from years 2005, 2009 and 2018 (source: NAPANT, own creation)

Figure 17. Aerial photographs of the locality 4 from years 2005, 2009 and 2018 (source: NAPANT, own creation)

Figure 18. Photo of the locality 4 (source: own creation)

Figure 18. Photo of the locality 4 (source: own creation)

Table 7. Description of the locality 5 (source: LGIS National Forest Center, GIS S-NAPANT)

Figure 19. Aerial photographs of the locality 5 from years 2005, 2009 and 2018 (source: NAPANT, own creation)

Figure 19. Aerial photographs of the locality 5 from years 2005, 2009 and 2018 (source: NAPANT, own creation)

Figure 20. Photo of the locality 5 (source: own creation)

Figure 20. Photo of the locality 5 (source: own creation)

Table 8. Description of the locality 6 (source: LGIS National Forest Center, GIS S-NAPANT)

Figure 21. Aerial photographs of the locality 6 from years 2005, 2009 and 2018 (source: NAPANT, own creation)

Figure 21. Aerial photographs of the locality 6 from years 2005, 2009 and 2018 (source: NAPANT, own creation)

Figure 22. Photo of the locality 6 (source: own creation)

Figure 22. Photo of the locality 6 (source: own creation)

Table 9. Description of the locality 7 (source: LGIS National Forest Center, GIS S-NAPANT)

Figure 23. Aerial photographs of the locality 7 from years 2005, 2009 and 2018 (source: NAPANT, own creation)

Figure 23. Aerial photographs of the locality 7 from years 2005, 2009 and 2018 (source: NAPANT, own creation)

Figure 24. Photo of the locality 7 (source: own creation)

Figure 24. Photo of the locality 7 (source: own creation)

Table 10. Description of the locality 8 (source: LGIS National Forest Center, GIS S-NAPANT)

Figure 25. Aerial photographs of the locality 8 from years 2005, 2009 and 2018 (source: NAPANT, own creation)

Figure 25. Aerial photographs of the locality 8 from years 2005, 2009 and 2018 (source: NAPANT, own creation)

Figure 26. Photo of the locality 8 (source: own creation)

Figure 26. Photo of the locality 8 (source: own creation)

Table 11. Description of the locality 9 (source: LGIS National Forest Center, GIS S-NAPANT)

Figure 27. Aerial photographs of the locality 9 from years 2005, 2009 and 2018 (source: NAPANT, own creation)

Figure 27. Aerial photographs of the locality 9 from years 2005, 2009 and 2018 (source: NAPANT, own creation)

Figure 28. Photo of the locality 9 (source: own creation)

Figure 28. Photo of the locality 9 (source: own creation)

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.