Figures & data
Figure 3. Comparisons between time-domain and frequency-domain solutions: (a) Car body vertical acceleration, (b) Wheel-rail vertical force
![Figure 3. Comparisons between time-domain and frequency-domain solutions: (a) Car body vertical acceleration, (b) Wheel-rail vertical force](/cms/asset/39c9e141-06bb-445e-a607-180e94fd1a68/tjrt_a_1811170_f0003_oc.jpg)
Figure 7. Carbody vertical motion, normalized with respect to : (a) Response of car body vertical motion in
and
plane, (b) Frequency response of car boy vertical motion for certain wavelengths of irregularities
![Figure 7. Carbody vertical motion, normalized with respect to kH⋅A: (a) Response of car body vertical motion in λ and v plane, (b) Frequency response of car boy vertical motion for certain wavelengths of irregularities](/cms/asset/80881175-99fa-4c3d-9da4-e6c8a6a61d19/tjrt_a_1811170_f0007_oc.jpg)
Figure 8. Car body pitch motion, normalized with respect to : (a) Response of car body pitch motion in
and
plane, (b) Frequency response of the car body pitch motion for certain wavelengths of irregularities
![Figure 8. Car body pitch motion, normalized with respect to kH⋅A: (a) Response of car body pitch motion in λ and v plane, (b) Frequency response of the car body pitch motion for certain wavelengths of irregularities](/cms/asset/a728cf9c-f63b-47aa-a21a-0b65667929d7/tjrt_a_1811170_f0008_oc.jpg)
Figure 13. Driving point receptance of rail: (a) Driving point track receptance, without vehicle, the first peak is at 52 Hz, (b) Driving point track receptance, with vehicle, first peak at 33 Hz
![Figure 13. Driving point receptance of rail: (a) Driving point track receptance, without vehicle, the first peak is at 52 Hz, (b) Driving point track receptance, with vehicle, first peak at 33 Hz](/cms/asset/41ee9d65-27ac-4ff1-9abb-064982a9f4cd/tjrt_a_1811170_f0013_oc.jpg)
Table A1. Main parameters of the vehicle
Table A2. Main parameters of the track structures