1,478
Views
16
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Special Section: Representing mental representations: Neuroscientific and computational approaches to information processing in the brain

Dynamic information processing states revealed through neurocognitive models of object semantics

Figures & data

Figure 1. The temporal and spatial distribution of object-specific semantic feature information. (a) Model fit between the HMax model (left) and the combined HMax and semantic feature model (centre) to the MEG data over sensors and time. Right: significant increases in model fit are observed from 190 ms when including semantic feature information in addition to the HMax model. (b) Spatial distribution of semantic feature effects from MEG and fMRI, showing a correspondence in the anterior temporal lobes. MEG data in ‘a’ and ‘b’ reproduced from Clarke et al. (Citation2014), fMRI data in ‘b’ reproduced from Clarke and Tyler (Citation2014).
Figure 1. The temporal and spatial distribution of object-specific semantic feature information. (a) Model fit between the HMax model (left) and the combined HMax and semantic feature model (centre) to the MEG data over sensors and time. Right: significant increases in model fit are observed from 190 ms when including semantic feature information in addition to the HMax model. (b) Spatial distribution of semantic feature effects from MEG and fMRI, showing a correspondence in the anterior temporal lobes. MEG data in ‘a’ and ‘b’ reproduced from Clarke et al. (Citation2014), fMRI data in ‘b’ reproduced from Clarke and Tyler (Citation2014).
Figure 2. Modulation of object processing by visual and semantic feature-based statistics over time. Data show rapid visual and shared semantic-feature effects before later effects of both shared and distinctive semantic features. Redrawn from Clarke et al. (Citation2013).
Figure 2. Modulation of object processing by visual and semantic feature-based statistics over time. Data show rapid visual and shared semantic-feature effects before later effects of both shared and distinctive semantic features. Redrawn from Clarke et al. (Citation2013).
Figure 3. Recurrent interactions between the left anterior temporal and posterior fusiform increase when more specific semantic information is required. Left: Increased phase-locking between these regions during basic (e.g. tiger) compared to domain naming (i.e. living or nonliving). Right: increased activity in the anterior temporal lobe peaks ~200 ms and posterior fusiform peaks ~250 ms. Redrawn from Clarke, Taylor, and Tyler (Citation2011).
Figure 3. Recurrent interactions between the left anterior temporal and posterior fusiform increase when more specific semantic information is required. Left: Increased phase-locking between these regions during basic (e.g. tiger) compared to domain naming (i.e. living or nonliving). Right: increased activity in the anterior temporal lobe peaks ~200 ms and posterior fusiform peaks ~250 ms. Redrawn from Clarke, Taylor, and Tyler (Citation2011).