No looking back: the effects of visual cues on the lexical boost in structural priming

Figures & data

Table 1. Mean proportions of target completions by Experiment and condition.

	Mean proportions of PO target completions out of all PO and DO completions			Mean proportions of other target completions
	PO prime	DO prime	Priming effect	PO prime	DO prime
Experiment 1 (prime visible)
Subject noun repeated	59.9 (3.1)	45.7 (3.1)	14.2	43.4 (2.4)	45.9 (2.3)
Subject noun not repeated	54.8 (3.3)	53.1 (3.1)	1.7	48.2 (2.4)	48.1 (2.3)
Experiment 2 (prime not visible)
Subject noun repeated	61.6 (2.8)	51.0 (2.9)	10.6	38.6 (2.2)	41.2 (2.2)
Subject noun not repeated	64.3 (2.9)	56.5 (3.0)	7.8	44.1 (2.3)	44.6 (2.2)
Experiment 3 (prime visible)
Verb repeated	77.4 (2.5)	51.3 (3.0)	26.1	34.0 (2.3)	34.7 (2.3)
Verb not repeated	67.1 (3.2)	55.1 (3.3)	12.0	48.6 (2.4)	45.2 (2.4)
Experiment 4 (prime not visible)
Verb repeated	76.0 (2.5)	51.6 (2.8)	24.4	38.8 (2.2)	34.7 (2.2)
Verb not repeated	68.9 (2.9)	61.4 (3.0)	7.5	45.3 (2.3)	47.4 (2.2)

Notes. Standard errors of the means in parentheses. Conditions where neither the subject nor the verb was repeated were identical between experiments. The means were calculated including only trials where participants produced either a PO or DO structure in the prime.