1,297
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

A cross-dimensional analysis of nanotechnology and equality: examining gender fairness and pro-poor potential in Canada’s R&D landscape

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 528-552 | Received 05 May 2019, Accepted 28 Jul 2020, Published online: 02 Sep 2020

Figures & data

Table 1. Number and share of nanotech-related publications and patents with energy, agri-food, and water applications.

Figure 1. (A) Share of different sectors in pro-poor nanotechnology authorship by province; (B) Share of different sectors by field. Abbreviations for provinces are: ON: Ontario; QC: Quebec; BC: British Columbia; AB: Alberta; Abbreviations for sectors are: U: University; G: Government; I: Industry; H: Hospital.

Figure 1. (A) Share of different sectors in pro-poor nanotechnology authorship by province; (B) Share of different sectors by field. Abbreviations for provinces are: ON: Ontario; QC: Quebec; BC: British Columbia; AB: Alberta; Abbreviations for sectors are: U: University; G: Government; I: Industry; H: Hospital.

Figure 2. (A) Number of publications by province in pro-poor nanotechnology; (B) Average annual growth rate of publications in pro-poor nanotechnology.

Figure 2. (A) Number of publications by province in pro-poor nanotechnology; (B) Average annual growth rate of publications in pro-poor nanotechnology.

Figure 3. Number of articles and authors (left axis) and share of female authorship (right axis) over the years in pro-poor nanotechnology. Abbreviations for gender are: F: Female, M: Male.

Figure 3. Number of articles and authors (left axis) and share of female authorship (right axis) over the years in pro-poor nanotechnology. Abbreviations for gender are: F: Female, M: Male.

Figure 4. Share of female authorship (left axis) and citation and journal impact (right axis) of the papers published by female and male authors (A) by sector (B) by application area and (C) by province (***, **, * show significance of gender differences at the 1%, 5% and 10% levels: details can be found in the appendix (Tables A1–A3)).

Figure 4. Share of female authorship (left axis) and citation and journal impact (right axis) of the papers published by female and male authors (A) by sector (B) by application area and (C) by province (***, **, * show significance of gender differences at the 1%, 5% and 10% levels: details can be found in the appendix (Tables A1–A3)).

Figure 5. (A) Share of different sectors in pro-poor nanotechnology inventorship by province; (B) Share of different sectors by field.

Figure 5. (A) Share of different sectors in pro-poor nanotechnology inventorship by province; (B) Share of different sectors by field.

Figure 6. (A) Number of patents by province in pro-poor nanotechnology; (B) Average annual growth rate of patents in pro-poor nanotechnology.

Figure 6. (A) Number of patents by province in pro-poor nanotechnology; (B) Average annual growth rate of patents in pro-poor nanotechnology.

Figure 7. Number of patents and inventors (left axis) and share of female inventorship (right axis) over the years in pro-poor nanotechnology.

Figure 7. Number of patents and inventors (left axis) and share of female inventorship (right axis) over the years in pro-poor nanotechnology.

Figure 8. Share of female inventorship (as a percentage) and citation impact (as a decimal) (left axis) and average claims (right axis) of the patents granted to female and male inventors (A) by sector (B) by application area and (C) by province (***, **, * show significance of gender differences at the 1%, 5% and 10% levels: details can be found in the appendix (Tables A4-A6)).

Figure 8. Share of female inventorship (as a percentage) and citation impact (as a decimal) (left axis) and average claims (right axis) of the patents granted to female and male inventors (A) by sector (B) by application area and (C) by province (***, **, * show significance of gender differences at the 1%, 5% and 10% levels: details can be found in the appendix (Tables A4-A6)).

Figure 9. (A) Share of female A-Is authorship (left axis) and citation and journal impact of papers published by female and male A-Is (right axis); (B) Share of female A-Is inventorship (as a percentage) and citation impact (as a decimal) (left axis) and average claims (right axis) of the patents granted to female and male A-Is (***, **, * show significance of gender differences at the 1%, 5% and 10% levels: details can be found in the appendix (Table A7)).

Figure 9. (A) Share of female A-Is authorship (left axis) and citation and journal impact of papers published by female and male A-Is (right axis); (B) Share of female A-Is inventorship (as a percentage) and citation impact (as a decimal) (left axis) and average claims (right axis) of the patents granted to female and male A-Is (***, **, * show significance of gender differences at the 1%, 5% and 10% levels: details can be found in the appendix (Table A7)).

Figure 10. (A) Share of companies contributed to the scientific and technological development of pro-poor nanotechnology applications by industry; (B) Gender gap in employment and wage by different pro-poor applications.

Figure 10. (A) Share of companies contributed to the scientific and technological development of pro-poor nanotechnology applications by industry; (B) Gender gap in employment and wage by different pro-poor applications.

Figure 11. Gender gap in employment (left) and wage (right) in Canadian industries.

Figure 11. Gender gap in employment (left) and wage (right) in Canadian industries.

Table A1. 95% Cls for average citation and journal impact of the papers authored by each gender and significance tests for their differences across different sectors (***, **, * show significance of gender differences at the 1%, 5% and 10% levels).

Table A2. 95% Cls for average citation and journal impact of the papers authored by each gender and significance tests for their differences across different application areas (***, **, * show significance of gender differences at the 1%, 5% and 10% levels).

Table A3. 95% Cls for average citation and journal impact of the papers authored by each gender and significance tests for their differences in Canada and across different provinces (***, **, * show significance of gender differences at the 1%, 5% and 10% levels).

Table A4. 95% Cls for average citation impact and claims of the patents of each gender and significance tests for their differences across different sectors (***, **, * show significance of gender differences at the 1%, 5% and 10% levels).

Table A5. 95% Cls for average citation impact and claims of the patents of each gender and significance tests for their differences across different application areas (***, **, * show significance of gender differences at the 1%, 5% and 10% levels).

Table A6. 95% Cls for average citation impact and claims of the patents of each gender and significance tests for their differences in Canada and across different provinces (***, **, * show significance of gender differences at the 1%, 5% and 10% levels).

Table A7. 95% Cls for average citation and journal impact of papers and average citation impact and claims of patents of A-Is of each gender and significance tests for their differences (***, **, * show significance of gender differences at the 1%, 5% and 10% levels).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.