From Value Sensitive Design to values absorption – building an instrument to analyze organizational capabilities for value-sensitive innovation

Table 2. Results of the exploratory factor analysis and the reliability analyses of the VAC-related survey items.

Table 3. Results of Inter-Rater Agreement for variables measured at employee level

Table 4. Correlations and descriptive statistics of the VAC variables, MorMot and InstrMot.

Table 5. Results of the exploratory factor analysis with VAC dimensions and Moral Motives.Table Footnote^a

Table 6. Results of the confirmatory factor analysis with each VAC dimension and Moral Motives.Table Footnote^a

Table 7. Results of the exploratory factor analysis with vac dimensions and instrumental motives.Table Footnote^a

Table 8. Results of the confirmatory factor analysis with each VAC dimension and instrumental motives.Table Footnote^a

Table 9. Results of concurrent validity – descriptive statistics and correlations of performance indicators.

Figure 2. Value-sensitive Absorptive Capacity (VAC) conceptual framework versus survey instrument.

Table A1. Overview of survey items for Value-sensitive Absorptive Capacity (VAC).

Table A2. Results of the CFA and the reliability analyses of the motive-related survey items.

Garst, J., V. Blok, O. Branzei, L. Jansen, and O. S. W. F. Omta. 2019. “Toward a Value-Sensitive Absorptive Capacity Framework: Navigating Intervalue and Intravalue Conflicts to Answer the Societal Call for Health.” Business & Society 000765031987610. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650319876108.

Owen, R., J. Stilgoe, P. Macnaghten, M. Gorman, E. Fisher, and D. Guston. 2013. “2. A Framework for Responsible Innovation.” In Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society, edited by R. Owen, J. R. Bessant, and M. Heintz, 27–50. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Inc.

Swanson, D. L. 1999. “Toward an Integrative Theory of Business and Society: A Research Strategy for Corporate Social Performance.” The Academy of Management Review 24 (3): 506–521. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1999.2202134.

Bansal, P. 2003. “From Issues to Actions: The Importance of Individual Concerns and Organizational Values in Responding to Natural Environmental Issues.” Organization Science 14 (5): 510–527. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.14.5.510.16765.

Nissenbaum, H. 2005. “Values in Technical Design.” In Encyclopedia of Science, Technology, and Ethics, edited by C. Mitcham, lxvi–llxx. New York: Macmillan.

Ortiz-de-Mandojana, N., and P. Bansal. 2016. “The Long-Term Benefits of Organizational Resilience Through Sustainable Business Practices: The Long-Term Benefits of Sustainable Business Practices.” Strategic Management Journal 37 (8): 1615–1631. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2410.

Hahn, T., L. Preuss, J. Pinkse, and F. Figge. 2014. “Cognitive Frames in Corporate Sustainability: Managerial Sensemaking with Paradoxical and Business Case Frames.” Academy of Management Review 39 (4): 463–487. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2012.0341.

Wood, D. J. 2010. “Measuring Corporate Social Performance: A Review.” International Journal of Management Reviews 12 (1): 50–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00274.x.

Bessant, J. 2013. “1. Innovation in the Twenty-First Century.” In Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society, edited by R. Owen, J. R. Bessant, and M. Heintz, 27–50. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Inc.

Friedman, B., P. H. Kahn, Jr., and A. Borning. 2002. Value Sensitive Design: Theory and Methods (UW CSE Technical Report 02-12-01). ftp://ftp.cs.washington.edu/tr/2002/12/UW-CSE-02-12-01.pdf.

Van de Poel, I. 2013. “Translating Values Into Design Requirements.” In Philosophy and Engineering: Reflections on Practice, Principles and Process, Vol. 15, edited by D. P. Michelfelder, N. McCarthy, and D. E. Goldberg, 253–266. Springer Netherlands. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-94-007-7762-0_20.

Miska, C., G. K. Stahl, and M. Fuchs. 2018. “The Moderating Role of Context in Determining Unethical Managerial Behavior: A Case Survey.” Journal of Business Ethics 153 (3): 793–812. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3374-5.

Dignum, M., A. Correljé, E. Cuppen, U. Pesch, and B. Taebi. 2015. “Contested Technologies and Design for Values: The Case of Shale Gas.” Science and Engineering Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-015-9685-6

Gehman, J., L. K. Treviño, and R. Garud. 2013. “Values Work: A Process Study of the Emergence and Performance of Organizational Values Practices.” Academy of Management Journal 56 (1): 84–112. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0628.

Hahn, T., J. Pinkse, L. Preuss, and F. Figge. 2016. “Ambidexterity for Corporate Social Performance.” Organization Studies 37 (2): 213–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840615604506.

Flanagan, M., D. C. Howe, and H. Nissenbaum. 2008. “Embodying Values in Technology: Theory and Practice.” In Information Technology and Moral Philosophy, edited by J. van den Hoven, and J. Weckert, 322–353. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511498725.017.

Zietsma, C., M. Winn, O. Branzei, and I. Vertinsky. 2002. “The War of the Woods: Facilitators and Impediments of Organizational Learning Processes.” British Journal of Management 13 (S2): S61–S74. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.13.s2.6.

Crane, A., G. Palazzo, L. J. Spence, and D. Matten. 2014. “Contesting the Value of “Creating Shared Value.”.” California Management Review 56 (2): 130–153. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2014.56.2.130.