Paving the way for a softer regulation of CRISPR in Norway: public engagement as window dressing

Figures & data

Table 1. An overview of the actors who responded to The Norwegian Biotechnology Advisory Boards’ invitation with written comments, as published on the Boards website. For reasons unknown, there is a discrepancy between the number of actors listed on the website, and the number of actors that the Board report in their final statement.

No	Name
1	De nasjonale forskningetiske komiteene (NENT)/The National Research-Ethical Comitees
2	Universitetet i Oslo/University of Oslo
3	Statens legemiddeltilsyn/The Norwegian Medicines Agency
4	Norges Bondelag/Norwegian Farmers Union
5	NMBU/The Norwegian University of Life Sciences
6	Sjømat Norge/Seafood Norway
7	Vitenskapsmuseet NTNU/Science Museum NTNU
8	NHO Mat og drikke/NHO Food and Drink
9	Geno Norsvin AquaGen
10	Natur og Ungdom/Nature and Youth
11	Landbruksdirektoratet/The Norwegian Agriculture Agency
12	Uni Research
13	Havforskningsinstituttet/ The Institute of Marine Research
14	Norges Bygdekvinnelag/Norwegian/Association for rural women
15	Universitetet i Bergen – Institutt for biovitenskap/University of Bergen
16	Norsk Industri/Association for Norwegian Industry
17	Oikos/Ecological Norway NGO
18	GenØk/Centre for Biosafety
19	Norsk Landbrukssamvirke/Norwegian Agricultural Cooperation
20	Norsk Gartnerforbund/Norwegian Gardners Association
21	Bondens marked Norge/Farmers Market Norway
22	Benchmark Genetics
23	Norsk Legemiddelindustri/The Norwegian Pharmaceutical Industry
24	Naturvernforbundet/Friends of the Earth Norway
25	Småbrukarlaget/The Norwegian Farmers and Smallholders’ Union
26	Graminor
27	Nofima/Institute for applied research within fisheries, aquaculture and food research.
28	Kirkerådet/The Council of the Norwegian Church
29	Heidner Biocluster
30	ACD Pharma
31	Tekna/Student Association
32	Ryggvoll melkeproduksjon/Ryggvoll Milk producer
33	German Federal Office of Consumer Protection and Food Safety
34	Nettverk for GMO-fri mat og fôr/Network for GMO free food
35	Uavhengige forskere ved NIBIO, NMBU og UiO/Independent researchers
36	Dorothy Dankel
37	Liv Langberg
38	Øyvind K Nilsen
39	Audun Nerland
40	Knut Morten Nyberg
41	Sigmund Ramberg
42	Pritam Bose
43	Åsmund Kaupang og Camilla Jensen
44	Sigmund Berg
45	Finn Kolberg
46	Thomas Tichelkamp
47	Johannes Gaare

Figure 1. The proposed tiered regulatory framework for GMOs (Bioteknologirådet 2017, 27).

Bioteknologirådet. 2017. Genteknologiloven – invitasjon til offentlig debatt. https://www.bioteknologiradet.no/filarkiv/2017/12/Genteknologiloven-uttalelse-invitasjon-til-offentlig-debatt-web.pdf.

 Google Scholar