Responsible innovation scholarship: normative, empirical, theoretical, and engaged

Figures & data

Table

Scholarly Approaches to Responsible Innovation
Articulation	Theoretical and conceptual inquiry and argumentation
Interpretation	Empirical observation and analysis
Assessment	Normative evaluation, appraisal, and critique
Intervention	Collaborative, deliberative, and experimental engagement

Figure 1. Breakdown of the scholarly styles and their combinations within JRI articles.

Table 1. JRI articles engaging in single vs. multiple styles.

Style use	No. of articles	Percentage
Single	117	38%
Multiple	187	62%

Table 2. JRI articles engaging in single styles.

Style	No. of articles	Percentage
Assessment	60	20%
Interpretation	35	11%
Articulation	22	7%
Intervention	0	0%