254
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Reviews

Co-Occurrence Mapping of Disparate Data Sets to Assess Potential Aquaculture Sites in the Gulf of Maine

ORCID Icon, , , , , , & show all
Pages 70-85 | Published online: 25 Jul 2017
 

ABSTRACT

As the need for aquaculture continues to grow, expansion of marine aquaculture into the coastal ocean and beyond will require an understanding of ocean use and attention to spatial planning with engagement from a variety of industry sectors and stakeholders. The easiest means to site aquaculture will be to demonstrate locations that lack of conflict with exiting industries and ecosystem components. Under this framework, the potential space for aquaculture in a 123,023-km2 area within the federal waters of the Gulf of Maine was determined by assessing concurrent use by the fishing and shipping industries and also by large pelagic animals (baleen whales and turtles). All three user groups were evaluated for use across seasons, and these data layers were then overlaid to create an index of low use areas that constitute a first pass assessment for where aquaculture would be suitable. The low-use areas (little presence of fishing, shipping and baleen whales and turtles) were focused on Nantucket shoals, and in the central parts of the Gulf of Maine and Georges Bank. A total of 18,778 km2, or 15.2%, was identified as low-use areas with the closest being 38 km to shore and the farthest being over 240 km from shore. With 46 km being the current outer limit for aquaculture profitability, then only 5,978 km2, or roughly 5%, is available. In order for aquaculture to be able to find more suitable space, it will need to work cooperatively with the existing users to demonstrate where space can be shared as opposed to being relegated to low-use portions of the Gulf of Maine.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. John Witzig of the Fisheries Statistics Office, Northeast Regional Office, National Marine Fishery Service for providing fisheries based data used in this work. R. Anderson and an anonymous reviewer provided valuable comments on a draft of this article. We also thank the countless people involved in the mammal and turtle surveys.

Funding

The project was funded under the OAR National Sea Grant College Program (Grant #NA08OAR4170828).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 670.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.