14,521
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Judging attractiveness: Biases due to raters’ own attractiveness and intelligence

, , & | (Reviewing Editor)
Article: 996316 | Received 06 Aug 2014, Accepted 04 Dec 2014, Published online: 20 Jan 2015

Figures & data

Figure 1. Five-minute interaction between dyads.

Figure 1. Five-minute interaction between dyads.

Table 1. Descriptive statistics of raters’ self-perceived attractiveness, intelligence, and mean ratings of attractiveness across targets

Figure 2. The effect of male raters’ attractiveness on their average rating of attractiveness across group members.

Note: The black line at 36 represents average attractiveness on a scale of 72.
Figure 2. The effect of male raters’ attractiveness on their average rating of attractiveness across group members.

Figure 3. The effect of female raters’ attractiveness on their average rating of attractiveness across group members.

Note: The black line at 36 represents average attractiveness on a scale of 72.
Figure 3. The effect of female raters’ attractiveness on their average rating of attractiveness across group members.

Figure 4. The effect of male raters’ intelligence on their average rating of attractiveness across group members.

Note: The black line at 36 represents average attractiveness on a scale of 72.
Figure 4. The effect of male raters’ intelligence on their average rating of attractiveness across group members.

Figure 5. The effect of female raters’ intelligence on their average rating of attractiveness across group members.

Note: The black line at 36 represents average attractiveness on a scale of 72.
Figure 5. The effect of female raters’ intelligence on their average rating of attractiveness across group members.
Supplemental material

Otis Quick-Scoring Mental Ability Test (Otis, 1954)

Download MS Word (464.5 KB)