Figures & data
Figure 1. External golden ratio, face length 1.618: face width 1.0.
Figure 2. Images from left to right and for each set represent the underweight, the ideal weight and the overweight categories.
Figure 3. Perceived attractiveness of the three weight groups.
Figure 4. Morphed target faces used in Study 1.
Figure 5. The use of indifference vs. compensation strategies in judgements of different weight groups as a function of perceived social status.
Figure 6. The use of indifference vs. compensation strategies in judgements of different weight groups as a function of perceived social status.
Table 1. The relationship between compensation bias and politeness norm vs. system justification
Figure 7. The relationship between women’s system justification and compensation bias for the overweight. W = warmth, C = competence. Zero represents no difference between W and C.
Figure 8. The relationship between norms of politeness and compensation bias for the overweight. W = warmth, C = competence. Zero represents no difference between W and C.
