1,084
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Is health-related quality of life the same for elderly polish migrants, Turkish migrants and German natives? Testing the reliability and construct validity of the Sf-36 health survey in a cross-cultural comparison

, , & | (Reviewing Editor)
Article: 1280984 | Received 20 Sep 2016, Accepted 04 Jan 2017, Published online: 07 Feb 2017

Figures & data

Figure 1. Eight dimensions and two components of the HRQoL (Ware et al., Citation1994).

Notes: PF = physical functioning, RP = role physical, BP = bodily pain, GH = general health, VT = vitality, SF = social functioning, RE = role emotional, MH = mental health, PC = physical component, MC = mental component. e1–e8 = corresponding error terms, the basis model assumes no correlation between the error terms.
Figure 1. Eight dimensions and two components of the HRQoL (Ware et al., Citation1994).

Table 1. Overview of recruitment process for each group. Absolute numbers of participants

Table 2. Overview of interview venues for each group. Absolute numbers of participants

Table 3. Background demographics of study sample

Table 4. Socio-economic data of study sample

Table 5. Cronbach’s α for the eight Sf-36 dimensions, Turkish, Polish and German group

Table 6. CMIN/df, CFI and RMSEA for Turkish, Polish, and German samples, before modification

Figure 2. (a) Model for Turkish group, after modification. CMIN/df: 5.307, CFI: 0.868 , RMSEA: 0.209. (b) Model for Polish group, after modification. CMIN/df: 1.501 , CFI: 0.976 , RMSEA: 0.070 and (c) Model for German group, after modification. CMIN/df: 3.790, CFI: 0.851, RMSEA: 0.167.

Notes: e1–e8 = errors, PF = physical functioning, RP = role physical, BP = bodily pain, GH = general health, VT = vitality, SF = social functioning, RE = role emotional, MH = mental health, PC = physical component, MC = mental component, CMIN/df = Chi-square/degrees of freedom, CFI = comparative fit index, RMSEA = root mean square error of approximation. General rule for acceptable fit: CMIN/df: < 3.0, CFI: ≥ 0.95, RMSEA: < 0.05–0.08. Acceptable fits are bold and italic.
Figure 2. (a) Model for Turkish group, after modification. CMIN/df: 5.307, CFI: 0.868 , RMSEA: 0.209. (b) Model for Polish group, after modification. CMIN/df: 1.501 , CFI: 0.976 , RMSEA: 0.070 and (c) Model for German group, after modification. CMIN/df: 3.790, CFI: 0.851, RMSEA: 0.167.

Table 7. Results of the MGCFA, including CMIN/df, CFI and RMSEA (90% CI)