Skip to Main Content

1,957

Views

4

CrossRef citations to date

0

Altmetric

Research Article

Effects of augmenting response options of the MMPI-2-RF: An extension of previous findings

Andrew CoxDominion Behavioral Healthcare, Richmond, VA, USA

,

Seth C. CourrégéDepartment of Psychology, Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, MI, USACorrespondence[email protected]

http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5115-3152 View further author information

,

Abigail H. FederDepartment of Psychology, Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, MI, USA

&

Nathan C. WeedDepartment of Psychology, Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, MI, USA

http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4195-8074

|

Kulbir Singh BirakUniversity Campus Suffolk, UK

(Reviewing Editor)

Figures & data

Table 1. Participants excluded by screening criteria from the MMPI-2-RF on both standard and augmented versions

Download CSV Display Table

Table 2. Coefficient alpha, k, and MIIC for MMPI-2-RF validity scales for standard and augmented versions within the combined sample

Download CSV Display Table

Table 3. Coefficient alpha, k, and MIIC for the MMPI-2-RF higher-order scales, psychopathology-five, and restructured clinical scales for standard and augmented versions within the combined sample

Download CSV Display Table

Table 4. Coefficient alpha, k, and MIIC for MMPI-2-RF specific problem scales for standard and augmented versions within the combined sample

Download CSV Display Table

Table 5. Correlations between standard and augmented higher order, psychopathology five, restructured clinical scales, and specific problems in the combined sample

Download CSV Display Table

Table 6. Correlations between MMPI-2-RF and MPQ scales for the standard and augmented versions by order of administration and for the combined sample

Download CSV Display Table