3,649
Views
15
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Work satisfaction, psychological resiliency and sense of coherence as correlates of work engagement

& ORCID Icon | (Reviewing Editor)
Article: 1451610 | Received 14 Aug 2017, Accepted 08 Mar 2018, Published online: 29 Mar 2018

Figures & data

Table 1. The Pearson correlation factors between analysed variables

Table 2. The Person correlation factors between job satisfaction, resiliency, sense of coherence and work engagement factors

Table 3. The results of regression analysis explanatory work engagement by job satisfaction, resiliency and sense of coherence

Figure 1. The effect of mediating the relationship between job satisfaction and work engagement through coherence explaining resilience.

Notes: The indirect effect: a1 × b1 = .33***, (LCI) .230 - (UCI) .517, a2 × b2 = .01; (LCI) - .050 - (UCI) .030, a1 × b2 = .02; (LCI) - .080 - (UCI) .110.
Figure 1. The effect of mediating the relationship between job satisfaction and work engagement through coherence explaining resilience.

Figure 2. The effect of mediating the relationship between job satisfaction and work engagement through resilience explaining coherence.

Notes: The indirect effect: a1 × b1 = .01; (LCI) - .50 - (UCI) .100, a2 × b2 = .24***, (LCI) .140 - (UCI) .035, a1 × b2 = .09**; (LCI) - .031 - (UCI) .192.
Figure 2. The effect of mediating the relationship between job satisfaction and work engagement through resilience explaining coherence.

Figure 3. Model 2: Resilience as a mediator in a relation between job satisfaction and work engagement.

Notes: The indirect effect: a × b = .10; (LCI) .023 - (UCI) .241.
Figure 3. Model 2: Resilience as a mediator in a relation between job satisfaction and work engagement.

Figure 4. Model 3: Coherence as a mediator in a relation between job satisfaction and work engagement.

Notes: The indirect effect: a × b = .35; (LCI) .230 - (UCI) .517.
Figure 4. Model 3: Coherence as a mediator in a relation between job satisfaction and work engagement.

Table 4 The effects of mediation components of sense of coherence in relation to job satisfaction—components of Work Engagement. All the indirect effects (a × b) are statistically significant (the regression factors are in the 95% intervals LCI—UCI does not contain zero)

Figure 5. Model of complete mediation by the component of coherence—comprehensibility and absorption.

Notes: The indirect effect: a × b = .16; (LCI) .051 - (UCI) .321.
Figure 5. Model of complete mediation by the component of coherence—comprehensibility and absorption.

Figure 6. Model of complete mediation by the component of coherence—manageability and absorption.

Notes: The indirect effect: a × b = .21; (LCI) .098 - (UCI) .370.
Figure 6. Model of complete mediation by the component of coherence—manageability and absorption.

Figure 7. Model of complete mediation by the component of coherence—meaningfulness and absorption.

Notes: The indirect effect: a × b = .28; (LCI) .124 - (UCI) .480.
Figure 7. Model of complete mediation by the component of coherence—meaningfulness and absorption.

Figure 8. Model of complete mediation by the component of coherence—meaningfulness and vigour.

Notes: The indirect effect: a × b = .40; (LCI) .229 - (UCI) .601.
Figure 8. Model of complete mediation by the component of coherence—meaningfulness and vigour.