Circumstances to integrate acceptance and commitment therapy with short-term psychodynamic psychotherapies

Figures & data

Table 1. Participant demographic data

No	Name	Gender	Ethnicity	Age	Degree	License	Psych exp	ACT exp	STPP exp	Integration exp
1	Marley	F	Caucasian	33	Masters	LMFT	1.5	1	1.5	1
2	Rita	F	Caucasian	42	Masters	LMFT	3	2	7	2
3	Emma	F	Caucasian	41	Masters	LMFT	15	3.5	12	3.5
4	Susie	F	WASP	50	Doctorate	Psy.D	12	7	9	2 to 3
5	Kara	F	Caucasian	32	Doctorate	Ph.D.	9.5	2.5	5	2.5
6	Tito	M	Caucasian	50	Doctorate	Ph.D.	27	10	25	10
7	Molly	F	Caucasian	54	Masters	LMFT	10.5	2.5	7	2.5
8	Sydney	F	Caucasian	55	Masters	LMFT	22	4	12	3
9	Frank	M	Caucasian	37	Doctorate	Psy.D	15	2.5	7	2.5
10	Maureen	F	Caucasian	33	Doctorate	Psy.D	9	2	2	2
11	Jenny	F	Caucasian	54	Masters	RClinP	29	10	29	10
12	Bonnie	F	EASH	47	Masters	RN/RClinP	4	4	4	4
13	Mary	F	Caucasian	58	Masters	LMFT	20	7	1	1

Note: All names have been changed to protect confidentiality; exp = experience in years; WASP = White Anglo-Saxon Protestant; RClinPsy = Registered clinical psychologist; LMFT = Licensed Marriage and Family therapist: EASH = European Australian with Scottish heritage; RN = Registered Nurse.

Figure 1. Flow chart following constructivist grounded theory process.

Source: Adapted from Constructing Grounded Theory by Charmaz (2014).

Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.

 Google Scholar