Sustainable accommodation choice in tourism and emotional intelligence connected: An exploratory study looking for evidence

Figures & data

Table 1. Correlation among Tot EIS, Sust hosp and Social well-being rs

	Social integration	Social contribution	Social actualization	Social coherence
Tot EIS	,609**	,461**	,309**	,359**
Sust hosp	,368**	,319**	,406**	,276**

Note: *p < .05, ** p < .01, and ***p < .001.

Table 2. Correlations between factors of social well-being and EI

	Social integration	Social contribution	Social actualization	Social coherence
Evaluation and expression of emotions	,485**	,443**	,323**	,216**
Adjustment of emotions	,506**	,319**	,295**	,485**
Using emotions in problem-solving	,510**	,287**	,194*	,278**

Note: *p < .05, ** p < .01, and ***p < .001.

Table 3. BIC measures for the different clusters number

Number of clusters	Schwartz’s Bayesian criterion	BIC change^a	Ratio of BIC change^b	Ratio of distance measure^c
1	236,872
2	183,546	−53,325	1,000	2,271
3	171,381	−12,165	228	1,372
4	167,993	−3,389	064	1,780
5	174,949	6,956	−130	1,430
6	185,897	10,949	−205	1,139
7	197,980	12,083	−227	1,057
8	210,500	12,520	−235	1,422
9	225,308	14,808	−278	1,215
10	241,074	15,766	−296	1,375

Note: ^a The changes are from the previous number of clusters in the table.

^b The ratios of the change are with respect to the change at the two clusters.

^c The ratios of distance measures are based on the current number of clusters against the previous numbers of clusters.

Table 4. Clusters’ description with mean, SD and number of cases

			Centroids
			TotEIS		SustHosp
		N	Mean	SD	Mean	SD
Cluster	1	112	103,9196	11,01444	25,6429	3,93,610
	2	45	120,8444	8,58,634	33,7778	3,75,916