818
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Effects of action observation on learning non-weight-bearing gait with crutches

, , , & | (Reviewing editor)
Article: 1517630 | Received 19 Mar 2018, Accepted 27 Aug 2018, Published online: 14 Sep 2018

Figures & data

Figure 1. Both control (CO) group and action observation (AO) group received verbal explanation before starting the experiment task. In addition to the verbal explanation, AO group watched a video of another person performing the same task (observation period). The non-weight-bearing (NWB) gait showed a third-person perspective of the entire body from the front, back, right, and left sides in the video. All participants were performed a total of 10 trials. The interval between trials was set to 30 s or more. Gait speed and trunk acceleration were measured during the 1st, 5th, and 10th trials for each group.

Figure 1. Both control (CO) group and action observation (AO) group received verbal explanation before starting the experiment task. In addition to the verbal explanation, AO group watched a video of another person performing the same task (observation period). The non-weight-bearing (NWB) gait showed a third-person perspective of the entire body from the front, back, right, and left sides in the video. All participants were performed a total of 10 trials. The interval between trials was set to 30 s or more. Gait speed and trunk acceleration were measured during the 1st, 5th, and 10th trials for each group.

Figure 2. (a) Gait speed in the 1st, 5th, and 10th trials. Two-way ANOVA revealed a main effect of trial (p < 0.05), but no effect of group (p > 0.05) and interaction (p > 0.05). (b) Acceleration root mean square (RMS) in the 1st, 5th, and 10th trials. The two-way ANOVA also revealed a main effect of trial (p < 0.05), group (p < 0.05), as well as trial and group interaction (p < 0.05). Post hoc analysis further showed significant differences in acceleration RMS (p < 0.05) between the control (CON) and action observation (AO) groups during the 1st trial.

Figure 2. (a) Gait speed in the 1st, 5th, and 10th trials. Two-way ANOVA revealed a main effect of trial (p < 0.05), but no effect of group (p > 0.05) and interaction (p > 0.05). (b) Acceleration root mean square (RMS) in the 1st, 5th, and 10th trials. The two-way ANOVA also revealed a main effect of trial (p < 0.05), group (p < 0.05), as well as trial and group interaction (p < 0.05). Post hoc analysis further showed significant differences in acceleration RMS (p < 0.05) between the control (CON) and action observation (AO) groups during the 1st trial.