Traumatising factors influencing interpersonal relationships of university students

Figures & data

Table 1. Demographic characteristics of the participants

Factors		Frequency	Percentage
Gender	Male	115	57.5%
	Female	85	42.5%
Age	15–18 years	45	22.5%
	19–22 years	93	46.5%
	23–26 years	53	26.5%
	27 and above	9	4.5%
Religion	Christians	131	65.5%
	Muslims	67	33.5%
	Missing	2	1%

Table 2. Showing the cross tabulation and chi square results

Traumatising factors			Interpersonal relationship		χ2	Df	Sig
		Overall	Poor	Good
Depression	Mild	48 (24.0%)	2 (4.2%)	46 (95.8%)	6.069^a	2	p < .048
	Moderate	107 (53.5%)	11 (10.3%)	96 (89.7%)
	Severe	45 (22.5%)	9 (20.0%)	36 (80.0%)
Emotionally abused	Not abused	194 (97.0%)	22 (11.3%)	172 (88.7%)	.383^a	1	p > .536
	Abuse	6 (3.0%)	0 (0.0%)	3 (100.0%)
Quality of life	Poor	1 (.5%)	0 (0.0%)	1 (100.0%)	.124^a	1	p > .725
	Good	199 (99.5)	22 (11.1%)	177 (88.9%)

Table 3. Summary of regression showing the relative contribution of each of the traumatising factors to the prediction of interpersonal relationship

Model		Unstandardized Coefficients		Standardized Coefficients	t	Sig.
		B	Std. Error	Beta
1	(Constant)	27.600	4.397		6.277	.000
	Depression	−.289	−.045	−.390	6.392	.000
	Quality of life	.156	.035	.275	4.484	.000
	Emotional abuse	.235	.08	.172	2.802	.006