1,797
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

A novel approach toward coordinated inventory management of an agile multi-echelon multi-product supply chain

, & | (Reviewing Editor)
Article: 1025596 | Received 04 Oct 2014, Accepted 27 Feb 2015, Published online: 24 Mar 2015

Figures & data

Figure 1. A three-echelon supply chain.

Figure 1. A three-echelon supply chain.

Figure 2. General schema of Section 3.

Figure 2. General schema of Section 3.

Figure 3. Inventory level of EOQ problem with partial backordering.

Figure 3. Inventory level of EOQ problem with partial backordering.

Figure 4. Inventory level of EPQ model with full backordering.

Figure 4. Inventory level of EPQ model with full backordering.

Table 1. Agility measurement factors

Figure 5. ANP network to rank suppliers.

Figure 5. ANP network to rank suppliers.

Figure 6. The inventory level of EOQ problem with full backordering for at the firm level.

Figure 6. The inventory level of EOQ problem with full backordering for at the firm level.

Figure 7. The combined inventory profile for the level of the retailer and manufacturing plant.

Figure 7. The combined inventory profile for the level of the retailer and manufacturing plant.

Figure 8. The combined inventory profile for the level of manufacturing plant.

Figure 8. The combined inventory profile for the level of manufacturing plant.

Figure 9. Pseudo-code of the applied hybrid optimization algorithm.

Figure 9. Pseudo-code of the applied hybrid optimization algorithm.

Figure 10. The general schematic of the population in DE.

Figure 10. The general schematic of the population in DE.

Table 2. The relevant data of the instances size

Table 3. Relevant date of final products at the retailer’s level

Table 4. Relevant data of final product at the manufacturing plant’s level

Table 5. Relevant data of raw material at the manufacturing plant’s level.

Table 6. Judgment about alternatives with respect to criteria product flexibility

Table 7. Judgment about clusters with respect to cluster technology/process related

Table 8. The value of objective functions and CPU time

Table 9. The comparison results of objective function value applying the DE and DE–PSO algorithms

Figure 11. The convergence path (problem 1).

Figure 11. The convergence path (problem 1).

Figure 12. The convergence path (problem 2).

Figure 12. The convergence path (problem 2).

Figure 13. The convergence path (problem 3).

Figure 13. The convergence path (problem 3).

Figure 14. The convergence path (problem 4).

Figure 14. The convergence path (problem 4).

Figure 15. The convergence path (problem 5).

Figure 15. The convergence path (problem 5).