907
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Performance of active contour models in train rolling stock part segmentation on high-speed video data

& | (Reviewing Editor)
Article: 1279367 | Received 17 Oct 2016, Accepted 30 Dec 2016, Published online: 19 Jan 2017

Figures & data

Figure 1. FIAT bogie of a train and its parts as defined in the Indian Railway Manual.

Figure 1. FIAT bogie of a train and its parts as defined in the Indian Railway Manual.

Figure 2. ICF bogie of a train and its parts as defined in the Indian Railway Manual.

Figure 2. ICF bogie of a train and its parts as defined in the Indian Railway Manual.

Figure 3. Manned rolling examination with two persons stationed at either side of the moving train near a railway station.

Figure 3. Manned rolling examination with two persons stationed at either side of the moving train near a railway station.

Figure 4. Rolling examination by using high-speed sports action camera for video database creation.

Figure 4. Rolling examination by using high-speed sports action camera for video database creation.

Figure 5. (a) Segmentation with CV model (Chan & Vese, Citation2001) and (b) Segmentation with CV with morphological differential gradient model.

Figure 5. (a) Segmentation with CV model (Chan & Vese, Citation2001) and (b) Segmentation with CV with morphological differential gradient model.

Figure 6. Curve evolution for fixed shape prior level set.

Figure 6. Curve evolution for fixed shape prior level set.

Figure 7. Curve evolution in shape invariance level set model.

Figure 7. Curve evolution in shape invariance level set model.

Figure 8. Ten bogie parts used for segmentation and testing the algorithms for segmentation.

Figure 8. Ten bogie parts used for segmentation and testing the algorithms for segmentation.

Figure 9. Virtual image fusion-based contrast-enhanced frames of rolling stock.

Figure 9. Virtual image fusion-based contrast-enhanced frames of rolling stock.

Figure 10. Visual comparison of the four algorithms used for RSE.

Figure 10. Visual comparison of the four algorithms used for RSE.

Figure 11. Number of iterations and initial contours for the (a) CV algorithm segmentation and (b) CV-MDG algorithm of a rolling bogie frame.

Figure 11. Number of iterations and initial contours for the (a) CV algorithm segmentation and (b) CV-MDG algorithm of a rolling bogie frame.

Figure 12. Average computation times of segmenting algorithms for 10 bogie parts.

Figure 12. Average computation times of segmenting algorithms for 10 bogie parts.

Figure 13. SSIM and PSNR for four parts by using four segmentation algorithms for 80 frames.

Figure 13. SSIM and PSNR for four parts by using four segmentation algorithms for 80 frames.

Table 1. Average values for all four algorithms with SSIM and PSNR