683
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

An approach for time-dependent reliability analysis of Jackup structures

, & | (Reviewing Editor)
Article: 1409932 | Received 22 Jul 2017, Accepted 19 Nov 2017, Published online: 06 Dec 2017

Figures & data

Figure 1. Trajectory of time dependent limit state.

Figure 1. Trajectory of time dependent limit state.

Figure 2. Flow chart for the methodology.

Figure 2. Flow chart for the methodology.

Table 1. Wave parameters

Figure 3. Jackup idealised model used in the study.

Figure 3. Jackup idealised model used in the study.

Figure 4. Surface elevation of a wave with P-M spectral energy density described by significant wave height Hs = 12 m and wave period Tz = 10.81 m (102 years return period).

Figure 4. Surface elevation of a wave with P-M spectral energy density described by significant wave height Hs = 12 m and wave period Tz = 10.81 m (102 years return period).

Figure 5. Surface elevation of a wave with P-M spectral energy density described by significant wave height Hs = 13.25 m and wave period Tz = 11.36 m (103 years return period).

Figure 5. Surface elevation of a wave with P-M spectral energy density described by significant wave height Hs = 13.25 m and wave period Tz = 11.36 m (103 years return period).

Figure 6. Surface elevation of a wave with P-M spectral energy density described by significant wave height Hs = 16.45 m and wave period Tz = 12.66 m (106 years return period).

Figure 6. Surface elevation of a wave with P-M spectral energy density described by significant wave height Hs = 16.45 m and wave period Tz = 12.66 m (106 years return period).

Figure 7. Mean crossing rates as a function of deck displacement computed using Poisson assumption method.

Figure 7. Mean crossing rates as a function of deck displacement computed using Poisson assumption method.

Figure 8. Mean crossing rates as a function of deck displacement computed using VanMarckes approximation method.

Figure 8. Mean crossing rates as a function of deck displacement computed using VanMarckes approximation method.

Figure 9. Time dependent probability of failure for 100 years return period.

Figure 9. Time dependent probability of failure for 100 years return period.

Figure 10. Time dependent probability of failure for 1000 years return period.

Figure 10. Time dependent probability of failure for 1000 years return period.

Figure 11. Time dependent probability of failure for 106 years return period.

Figure 11. Time dependent probability of failure for 106 years return period.