1,064
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Numerical simulation of improved RHS column-to-I beam flange-plate bolted connections for avoiding tensile fracture

& | (Reviewing editor)
Article: 1490147 | Received 25 Sep 2017, Accepted 14 Jun 2018, Published online: 11 Jul 2018

Figures & data

Figure 1. Specimen design.

Figure 1. Specimen design.

Figure 2. Connection details.

Figure 2. Connection details.

Table 1. Mechanical properties of materials

Figure 3. Test set-up.

Figure 3. Test set-up.

Table 2. Failure sequences of specimen T-1

Figure 4. Moment vs. beam rotation hysteric curves.

Figure 4. Moment vs. beam rotation hysteric curves.

Figure 5. Tensile failure T-1.

Figure 5. Tensile failure T-1.

Figure 6. Local buckling observed in T-2.

Figure 6. Local buckling observed in T-2.

Figure 7. the flange plate rupture (T-3).

Figure 7. the flange plate rupture (T-3).

Figure 8. Dissipated energy during load cycling.

Figure 8. Dissipated energy during load cycling.

Figure 9. Finite element mesh.

Figure 9. Finite element mesh.

Figure 10. Detail mesh of bolted connection.

Figure 10. Detail mesh of bolted connection.

Figure 11. Mode components (T-1).

Figure 11. Mode components (T-1).

Figure 12. Mode components (T-2).

Figure 12. Mode components (T-2).

Figure 13. Finite element model of bolt.

Figure 13. Finite element model of bolt.

Figure 14. Steel stress–strain curve.

Figure 14. Steel stress–strain curve.

Figure 15. Hysteresis curves (T-1).

Figure 15. Hysteresis curves (T-1).

Figure 16. Hysteresis curves (T-2).

Figure 16. Hysteresis curves (T-2).

Figure 17. Hysteresis curves (T-3).

Figure 17. Hysteresis curves (T-3).

Figure 18. Moment–rotation relationships.

Figure 18. Moment–rotation relationships.

Figure 19. T-1 Moment–rotation relationships.

Figure 19. T-1 Moment–rotation relationships.

Figure 20. T-2 Moment–rotation relationships.

Figure 20. T-2 Moment–rotation relationships.

Figure 21. T-3 Moment–rotation relationships.

Figure 21. T-3 Moment–rotation relationships.

Figure 22. T-1 Plastic strain distribution.

Figure 22. T-1 Plastic strain distribution.

Figure 23. FE analyses result of the beam top flange buckling (T-2).

Figure 23. FE analyses result of the beam top flange buckling (T-2).

Figure 24. T-3 Plastic strain distribution under the cyclic load.

Figure 24. T-3 Plastic strain distribution under the cyclic load.

Figure 25. T-2 Plastic strain distribution under the cyclic load.

Figure 25. T-2 Plastic strain distribution under the cyclic load.

Figure 26. Distribution of pressure between the flange-plate and beam bottom flange caused by bolt pretension force.

Figure 26. Distribution of pressure between the flange-plate and beam bottom flange caused by bolt pretension force.

Figure 27. Distribution of force between the flange-plate and beam bottom flange at the ultimate load (T-2).

Figure 27. Distribution of force between the flange-plate and beam bottom flange at the ultimate load (T-2).

Figure 28. Distribution of force between the flange-plate and beam bottom flange at the ultimate load (T-3).

Figure 28. Distribution of force between the flange-plate and beam bottom flange at the ultimate load (T-3).

Figure 29. Fracture paths at the beam end in tests.

Figure 29. Fracture paths at the beam end in tests.

Figure 30. Proposed fracture paths at the beam end.

Figure 30. Proposed fracture paths at the beam end.

Figure 31. Moment carried by welded web joint.

Figure 31. Moment carried by welded web joint.

Figure 32. Details of the flange–plate connection.

Figure 32. Details of the flange–plate connection.

Table 3. Failure sequences of specimen T-2

Table 4. Failure sequences of specimen T-3

Table 5. The tensile capacity comparison between the test and prediction results