https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5565-770X
Figures & data
Table 1. Tacit statements in gearbox optimization
Figure 1. QFD structure.
Figure 2. Analytical hierarchy process.
Table 2. Preference schedule (Ayhan, Citation2013)
Table 3. Fuzzy-QFD triangular scale
Figure 3. Methodology.
Table 4. Application specifications
Table 5. Voice of customer statements
Figure 4. Customer requirements.
Table 6. VOC evaluations
Table 7. DR evaluations
Table 8. Possible concepts (case study 1)
Table 9. Application of tacit knowledge
Table 10. Pairwise comparison of all criteria
Table 11. The geometric mean and relative fuzzy weights
Table 12. Average and normalized weight
Table 13. Pairwise comparisons based on weight
Table 14. Pairwise comparison based on volume
Table 15. Pairwise comparison based on power output
Table 16. Pairwise comparison based on centre distance
Table 17. Normalized non-fuzzy relative weights of each alternative for each criterion
Table 18. Aggregated results for each alternative according to each criterion for case study 1
Table 19. Possible concepts
Table 20. Tacit knowledge application
Table 21. Aggregated results for each alternative according to each criterion for case study 2
Appendix 1. Gear Concept Selection Matrix