Optimal integration of different types of DGs in radial distribution system by using Harris hawk optimization algorithm

Table 2. Comparison of simulation results of HHO and TLBO type-I DG units for 69-bus system

Table 3. Comparison of simulation results of HHO and TLBO type-II DG units for 33-bus system

Figure 5. Comparison of objective function convergence characteristics of HHO and TLBO with type-I DG for 33-bus RDS.

Figure 6. Comparison of objective function convergence characteristics of HHO and TLBO with type-I DG for 69-bus RDS.

Figure 7. Bus voltages with and without Type-II DGs deployment and the effect of the number of DGs on loss minimization for 33- and 69-bus systems.

Figure 8. Comparison of objective function convergence characteristics of HHO and TLBO with type-II DG for 33-bus RDS.

Figure 9. Comparison of objective function convergence characteristics of HHO and TLBO with type-II DG for 69-bus RDS.

Table 4. Comparison of simulation results of HHO and TLBO type-II DG units for 69-bus system

Table 5. Comparison of simulation results of HHO and TLBO type-III DG units for 33-bus system

Figure 10. Bus voltages with and without Type-III DGs deployment and the effect of the number of DGs on loss minimization for 33 and 69-bus systems.

Figure 11. Comparison of objective function convergence characteristics of HHO and TLBO with type-III DG for 33-bus RDS.

Figure 12. Comparison of objective function convergence characteristics of HHO and TLBO with type-III DG for 69-bus RDS.

Table 6. Comparison of simulation results of HHO and TLBO type-III DG units for 69-bus system

Table 7. Comparison of simulation results of HHO and TLBO type-IV DG units for 33-bus system

Figure 13. Bus voltages with and without Type-IV DGs deployment and the effect of the number of DGs on loss minimization for 33 and 69-bus systems.

Figure 14. Comparison of objective function convergence characteristics of HHO and TLBO with type-IV DG for 33-bus RDS.

Figure 15. Comparison of objective function convergence characteristics of HHO and TLBO with type-IV DG for 69-bus RDS.

Table 8. Comparison of simulation results of HHO and TLBO type-IV DG units for 69-bus system

Table 9. Comparison of economic analysis of HHO and TLBO for 33-bus system

Table 10. Comparison of economic analysis of HHO and TLBO for 69-bus system

Table

Display Table

Heidari, A. A., Mirjalili, S., Faris, H., Aljarah, I., Mafarja, M., & Chen, H. (2019). Harris hawks optimization: Algorithm and applications. Future Generation Computer Systems, 97, 849–872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2019.02.028

Murty, V. V. V. S. N., & Kumar, A. (2019). Optimal DG integration and network reconfiguration in microgrid system with realistic time varying load model using hybrid optimisation. IET Smart Grid, 2(2), 192–202. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-stg.2018.0146

Prakash, D. B., & Lakshminarayana, C. (2018). Multiple DG placements in radial distribution system for multi objectives using whale optimization algorithm. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 57(4), 2797–28065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2017.11.003

Sanjay, R., Jayabarathi, T., Raghunathan, T., Ramesh, V., & Mithulananthan, N. (2017). Optimal allocation of distributed generation using hybrid Grey Wolf optimizer. IEEE Access, 5, 14807–14818. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2726586

ChithraDevi, S. A., Lakshminarasimman, L., & Balamurugan, R. (2017). Stud Krill herd algorithm for multiple DG placement and sizing in a radial distribution system. Engineering Science and Technology, 20(2), 748–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jestch.2016.11.009

Kansal, S., Kumar, V., & Tyagi, B. (2016). Hybrid approach for optimal placement of multiple DGs of multiple types in distribution networks. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 75, 226–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2015.09.002

Muthukumar, K., & Jayalalitha, S. (2016). Optimal placement and sizing of distributed generators and shunt capacitors for power loss minimization in radial distribution networks using hybrid heuristic search optimization technique. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 78, 299–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2015.11.019

Suresh, M. C. V., & Belwin, E. J. (2018). Optimal DG placement for benefit maximization in distribution networks by using Dragonfly algorithm. Renewables: Wind, Water and Solar, 5(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40807-018-0050-7

Kaur, S., Kumbhar, G., & Sharma, J. (2014). A MINLP technique for optimal placement of multiple DG units in distribution systems. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 63, 609–617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2014.06.023

Prasad, C. H., Subbaramaiah, K., & Sujatha, P. (2019). Cost–benefit analysis for optimal DG placement in distribution systems by using elephant herding optimization algorithm. Renewables: Wind, Water and Solar, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40807-019-0056-9

Tamilselvan, V., Jayabarathi, T., Raghunathan, T., & Yang, X.-S. (2018). Optimal capacitor placement in radial distribution systems using flower pollination algorithm. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 57(4), 2775–2786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2018.01.004

Kansal, S., Sai, B. B. R., Tyagi, B., & Kumar, V. 2011. Optimal placement of wind-based generation in distribution networks. IET conference on renewable power generation (RPG 2011) (pp. 1–6). Edinburgh. https://doi.org/10.1049/cp.2011.0141

Musa, I., Gadoue, S., & Zahawi, B. (2016). Integration of induction generator based distributed generation in power distribution networks using a discrete particle swarm optimization algorithm. Electric Power Components and Systems, 44(3), 268–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/15325008.2015.1110215