1,251
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
CIVIL & ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING

A Strain model for uPVC tube-confined concrete

ORCID Icon | (Reviewing editor)
Article: 1868695 | Received 29 Sep 2020, Accepted 21 Dec 2020, Published online: 25 Jan 2021

Figures & data

Figure 1. Coupon dimensions for tensile testing

Figure 1. Coupon dimensions for tensile testing

Figure 2. uPVC coupon test: (a) during loading; (b) after testing

Figure 2. uPVC coupon test: (a) during loading; (b) after testing

Figure 3. Failure of the hollow tube due to local buckling

Figure 3. Failure of the hollow tube due to local buckling

Figure 4. uPVC tube confined columns with 5 mm thickness before the test

Figure 4. uPVC tube confined columns with 5 mm thickness before the test

Figure 5. uPVC tube confined columns with 5 mm thickness after the test

Figure 5. uPVC tube confined columns with 5 mm thickness after the test

Figure 6. uPVC tube confined columns with 7 mm thickness: (a) before the test; (b) and (c) after the test

Figure 6. uPVC tube confined columns with 7 mm thickness: (a) before the test; (b) and (c) after the test

Figure 7. Stress-strain relationship of uPVC-confined concrete under axial load

Figure 7. Stress-strain relationship of uPVC-confined concrete under axial load

Table 1. Ultimate stress and strain of uPVC-confined concrete

Table 2. Experimental database of uPVC-confined concrete under direct load

Figure 8. Predicted strain ratio εcu/εco using FRP equations versus experimental εcu/εco

Figure 8. Predicted strain ratio εcu/εco using FRP equations versus experimental εcu/εco

Figure 8. (Continued)

Figure 8. (Continued)

Figure 8. (Continued)

Figure 8. (Continued)

Figure 8. (Continued)

Figure 8. (Continued)

Figure 8. (Continued)

Figure 8. (Continued)

Figure 9. Predicted εcu/εco using the proposed model versus experimental εcu/εco 566 values

Figure 9. Predicted εcu/εco using the proposed model versus experimental εcu/εco 566 values