1,296
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
MATERIALS ENGINEERING

Assessment of alkaline treatment of palm kernel fiber and curing duration on selected properties of cement-paper composite boards

, ORCID Icon, , , , , & | (Reviewing editor) show all
Article: 1909690 | Received 05 Nov 2020, Accepted 26 Feb 2021, Published online: 26 Apr 2021

Figures & data

Figure 1. Image of materials used in the study (a) palm kernel fiber (b) coconut shell (c) waste paper slurry and (d) some of the untrimmed board composites developed

Figure 1. Image of materials used in the study (a) palm kernel fiber (b) coconut shell (c) waste paper slurry and (d) some of the untrimmed board composites developed

Table 1. Mix proportion of composite developed for untreated (UPKF)/treated palm kernel fiber (TPKF)

Table 2. Chemical composition of coconut shell powder additive

Table 3. Cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin content present in paper, treated and untreated fiber

Figure 2. Surface morphology of (a) untreated and (b) treated palm kernel fiber

Figure 2. Surface morphology of (a) untreated and (b) treated palm kernel fiber

Figure 3. Effects of untreated and treated fiber addition on porosity at curing days of (a) 28 days (b) 49 days with experimental trend analysis (3 c) property evaluation of experimental variables (3d) property evaluation of experimental variables

Figure 3. Effects of untreated and treated fiber addition on porosity at curing days of (a) 28 days (b) 49 days with experimental trend analysis (3 c) property evaluation of experimental variables (3d) property evaluation of experimental variables

Figure 4. Effects of untreated and treated fiber addition on water absorption at curing days of (a) 28 days and (b) 49 days with (c) experimental trend analysis and (d) property evaluation of experimental variables

Figure 4. Effects of untreated and treated fiber addition on water absorption at curing days of (a) 28 days and (b) 49 days with (c) experimental trend analysis and (d) property evaluation of experimental variables

Figure 5. Effects of untreated and treated fiber addition on moisture absorption at curing days of (a) 28 days and (b) 49 days with (c) experimental trend analysis and (d) property evaluation of experimental variables

Figure 5. Effects of untreated and treated fiber addition on moisture absorption at curing days of (a) 28 days and (b) 49 days with (c) experimental trend analysis and (d) property evaluation of experimental variables

Figure 6. Effects of untreated and treated fiber addition on bulk density at curing days of (a) 28 days and (b) 49 days with (c) experimental trend analysis and (d) property evaluation of experimental variables

Figure 6. Effects of untreated and treated fiber addition on bulk density at curing days of (a) 28 days and (b) 49 days with (c) experimental trend analysis and (d) property evaluation of experimental variables

Figure 7. Effects of untreated and treated fiber addition on linear shrinkage at curing days of (a) 28 days and (b) 49 days with (c) experimental trend analysis and (d) property evaluation of experimental variables

Figure 7. Effects of untreated and treated fiber addition on linear shrinkage at curing days of (a) 28 days and (b) 49 days with (c) experimental trend analysis and (d) property evaluation of experimental variables

Figure 8. Effects of untreated and treated fiber addition on volumetric shrinkage at curing days of (a) 28 days and (b) 49 days with (c) experimental trend analysis and (d) property evaluation of experimental variables

Figure 8. Effects of untreated and treated fiber addition on volumetric shrinkage at curing days of (a) 28 days and (b) 49 days with (c) experimental trend analysis and (d) property evaluation of experimental variables

Figure 9. Effects of untreated and treated fiber addition on tensile strength at curing days of (a) 28 days and (b) 49 days with (c) experimental trend analysis and (d) property evaluation of experimental variables

Figure 9. Effects of untreated and treated fiber addition on tensile strength at curing days of (a) 28 days and (b) 49 days with (c) experimental trend analysis and (d) property evaluation of experimental variables

Figure 10. Effects of untreated and treated fiber addition on impact strength at curing days of (a) 28 days and (b) 49 days with (c) experimental trend analysis and (d) property evaluation of experimental variables

Figure 10. Effects of untreated and treated fiber addition on impact strength at curing days of (a) 28 days and (b) 49 days with (c) experimental trend analysis and (d) property evaluation of experimental variables

Figure 11. Effects of untreated and treated fiber addition on abrasion resistance at curing days of (a) 28 days and (b) 49 days with (c) experimental trend analysis and (d) property evaluation of experimental variables

Figure 11. Effects of untreated and treated fiber addition on abrasion resistance at curing days of (a) 28 days and (b) 49 days with (c) experimental trend analysis and (d) property evaluation of experimental variables

Figure 12. Effects of untreated and treated fiber addition on bursting strength at curing days of (a) 28 days and (b) 49 days with (c) experimental trend analysis and (d) property evaluation of experimental variables

Figure 12. Effects of untreated and treated fiber addition on bursting strength at curing days of (a) 28 days and (b) 49 days with (c) experimental trend analysis and (d) property evaluation of experimental variables

Figure 13. SEM images of samples containing varying amounts of treated fiber (0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, and 2.5 wt. %) represented in a, b, c, d, e, and f, respectively

Figure 13. SEM images of samples containing varying amounts of treated fiber (0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, and 2.5 wt. %) represented in a, b, c, d, e, and f, respectively

Table 4. Effective property index (EPI) for each mix proportion