706
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Mechanical Engineering

Enhancement in heat transfer characteristics by using truncated conical turbulators in a double pipe heat exchanger under turbulent conditions

, , & ORCID Icon
Article: 2250069 | Received 19 Apr 2023, Accepted 16 Aug 2023, Published online: 27 Aug 2023

Figures & data

Table 1. Influence of turbulators on the solar air heater performance

Table 2. Details of the inserts used in a tubular heat exchanger

Figure 1. Comparison between the CFD predicted and analytical values for Nu.

Figure 1. Comparison between the CFD predicted and analytical values for Nu.

Figure 2. Schematic representation of the heat exchanger with the conical turbulator.

Figure 2. Schematic representation of the heat exchanger with the conical turbulator.

Figure 3a. Meshed model of the truncated conical turbulated heat exchanger.

Figure 3a. Meshed model of the truncated conical turbulated heat exchanger.

Figure 3b. Grid independence study for the truncated conical turbulated heat exchanger.

Figure 3b. Grid independence study for the truncated conical turbulated heat exchanger.

Table 3. Dimensions and Specifications of the heat exchanger

Figure 4. Contour plot showing the velocity variation (a) along the length (b) exit velocity for Re 3000 and 15,000.

Figure 4. Contour plot showing the velocity variation (a) along the length (b) exit velocity for Re 3000 and 15,000.

Figure 5. Contour plot showing the temperature variation along the length for Re 3000 and 15,000.

Figure 5. Contour plot showing the temperature variation along the length for Re 3000 and 15,000.

Figure 6. Contour plot showing the turbulent intensity variation along the length for Re 3000 and 15,000.

Figure 6. Contour plot showing the turbulent intensity variation along the length for Re 3000 and 15,000.

Figure 7. Contour plot showing the turbulent kinetic energy variation along the length for Re 3000 and 15,000.

Figure 7. Contour plot showing the turbulent kinetic energy variation along the length for Re 3000 and 15,000.

Figure 8. (A) variation of velocity contours (b) variation of turbulent intensity (c) exit temperature variation for different pitch values.

Figure 8. (A) variation of velocity contours (b) variation of turbulent intensity (c) exit temperature variation for different pitch values.

Figure 9. Variation of temperature along the length of the heat exchanger for different pitch values.

Figure 9. Variation of temperature along the length of the heat exchanger for different pitch values.

Figure 10. Variation of Nu and annulus HTC with pitch values for different Re.

Figure 10. Variation of Nu and annulus HTC with pitch values for different Re.

Figure 11. Variation of ΔP and friction factor with pitch values for different Re.

Figure 11. Variation of ΔP and friction factor with pitch values for different Re.

Figure 12. Variation of THPI with pitch values for different Re.

Figure 12. Variation of THPI with pitch values for different Re.

Table 4. Comparison of the present results with Published literature