438
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING

A novel embedded system for tractor implement performance mapping

, ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, , & show all
Article: 2311093 | Received 06 Nov 2023, Accepted 23 Jan 2024, Published online: 04 Feb 2024

Figures & data

Figure 1. (A) GPS module; (B) Hall effect sensor; (C) Rotary potentiometer; (D) Three-point hitch dynamometer.

Figure 1. (A) GPS module; (B) Hall effect sensor; (C) Rotary potentiometer; (D) Three-point hitch dynamometer.

Table 1. Transducers and their specifications.

Figure 2. Geo position data points on the field.

Figure 2. Geo position data points on the field.

Figure 3. Setup for (A) speed measurement; (B) depth measurement.

Figure 3. Setup for (A) speed measurement; (B) depth measurement.

Figure 4. Calibration setup for (A) load cell in compression; (B) load cell in tension; (C) depth measurement.

Figure 4. Calibration setup for (A) load cell in compression; (B) load cell in tension; (C) depth measurement.

Figure 5. Calibration curve (A) load cell in compression; (B) load cell 1 in tension; (C) load cell 2 in tension; (D) for depth measurement.

Figure 5. Calibration curve (A) load cell in compression; (B) load cell 1 in tension; (C) load cell 2 in tension; (D) for depth measurement.

Figure 6. Circuit diagram of the developed embedded system.

Figure 6. Circuit diagram of the developed embedded system.

Figure 7. Developed embedded system (A) front view; (B) inner view; (C) side view.

Figure 7. Developed embedded system (A) front view; (B) inner view; (C) side view.

Figure 8. Field test with (A) cultivator; (B) harrow.

Figure 8. Field test with (A) cultivator; (B) harrow.

Figure 9. Validation of speed measurement.

Figure 9. Validation of speed measurement.

Figure 10. Validation of depth measurement.

Figure 10. Validation of depth measurement.

Figure 11. Measured and predicted draft variations with time (A) cultivator; (B) harrow.

Figure 11. Measured and predicted draft variations with time (A) cultivator; (B) harrow.

Figure 12. Comparison of measured and predicted draft for (A) cultivator; (B) harrow.

Figure 12. Comparison of measured and predicted draft for (A) cultivator; (B) harrow.

Figure 13. Spatial variability maps of (A) tillage depth; (B) draft force; (C) wheel slip; (D) travel speed for the cultivator.

Figure 13. Spatial variability maps of (A) tillage depth; (B) draft force; (C) wheel slip; (D) travel speed for the cultivator.

Figure 14. Spatial variability maps of (A) tillage depth; (B) draft force; (C) wheel slip; (D) travel speed for disk harrow.

Figure 14. Spatial variability maps of (A) tillage depth; (B) draft force; (C) wheel slip; (D) travel speed for disk harrow.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article; further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.