240
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Mechanical Engineering

DOE coupled MLP-ANN for optimization of thrust force and torque during drilling of CCFRP composite laminates

, ORCID Icon, , , &
Article: 2319397 | Received 27 Sep 2023, Accepted 12 Feb 2024, Published online: 05 Mar 2024

Figures & data

Figure 1. Workpiece specimen (a) Image of coconut coir fiber (b) Image of CCFRP composite laminates (c) Microstructure of CCFRP composite laminates.

Figure 1. Workpiece specimen (a) Image of coconut coir fiber (b) Image of CCFRP composite laminates (c) Microstructure of CCFRP composite laminates.

Table 1. Mechanical properties coir fiber (Hasan et al., Citation2021).

Table 2. Properties of epoxy resin and hardener (Hasan et al., Citation2021).

Table 3. Drilling test parameters and levels.

Figure 2. Schematics of MLP Artificial Neural Network.

Figure 2. Schematics of MLP Artificial Neural Network.

Figure 3. Main Effect Plot for Thrust force (N) against (a) Spindle Speed (RPM), (b) Feed Rate (mm/min), (c) Point Angle (Degrees), (d) Fiber Length (mm), (e) Fiber Volume (%), (f) Fiber Diameter (microns).

Figure 3. Main Effect Plot for Thrust force (N) against (a) Spindle Speed (RPM), (b) Feed Rate (mm/min), (c) Point Angle (Degrees), (d) Fiber Length (mm), (e) Fiber Volume (%), (f) Fiber Diameter (microns).

Figure 4. Main Effect Plot for Torque (N-m) against (a) Spindle Speed (RPM), (b) Feed Rate (mm/min), (c) Point Angle (Degrees), (d) Fiber Length (mm), (e) Fiber Volume (%), (f) Fiber Diameter (microns).

Figure 4. Main Effect Plot for Torque (N-m) against (a) Spindle Speed (RPM), (b) Feed Rate (mm/min), (c) Point Angle (Degrees), (d) Fiber Length (mm), (e) Fiber Volume (%), (f) Fiber Diameter (microns).

Table 4. Experimental values of Thrust Force (N) and Torque (N-m).

Figure 5. Images of drilled hole under different spindle speeds (a) 1000 rpm (b) 1500 rpm (c) 2000 rpm.

Figure 5. Images of drilled hole under different spindle speeds (a) 1000 rpm (b) 1500 rpm (c) 2000 rpm.

Figure 6. SEM images of drilled hole under different spindle speeds. (a) 1000 rpm (b) 1500rpm (c) 2000rpm.

Figure 6. SEM images of drilled hole under different spindle speeds. (a) 1000 rpm (b) 1500rpm (c) 2000rpm.

Figure 7. Images of chips formed under different spindle speed (a) 1000 rpm (b) 1500 rpm (c) 2000 rpm.

Figure 7. Images of chips formed under different spindle speed (a) 1000 rpm (b) 1500 rpm (c) 2000 rpm.

Table 5. Analysis of variance for SN ratios for Thrust force (N).

Table 6. Analysis of variance for SN ratios for Torque (N-m).

Figure 8. Thrust force (a) contour plot and (b) surface plot in spindle speed- fiber volume% plane at constant feed rate, point angle, fiber length and fiber diameter.

Figure 8. Thrust force (a) contour plot and (b) surface plot in spindle speed- fiber volume% plane at constant feed rate, point angle, fiber length and fiber diameter.

Figure 9. Torque (a) contour plot and (b) surface plot in spindle speed- fiber volume% plane at constant feed rate, point angle, fiber length and fiber diameter.

Figure 9. Torque (a) contour plot and (b) surface plot in spindle speed- fiber volume% plane at constant feed rate, point angle, fiber length and fiber diameter.

Figure 10. Thrust force signals for (a) Fiber volume of 50% (b) Fiber volume of 40% and (c) Fiber volume of 30% CCFRP composite.

Figure 10. Thrust force signals for (a) Fiber volume of 50% (b) Fiber volume of 40% and (c) Fiber volume of 30% CCFRP composite.

Figure 11. Torque signals for (a) Fiber volume of 50% (b) Fiber volume of 40% and (c) Fiber volume of 30% CCFRP composite.

Figure 11. Torque signals for (a) Fiber volume of 50% (b) Fiber volume of 40% and (c) Fiber volume of 30% CCFRP composite.

Table 7. Analysis of variance for Thrust force (N).

Table 8. Analysis of variance for Torque (N-m).

Figure 12. Plot for composite desirability factor [Thrust force (N)].

Figure 12. Plot for composite desirability factor [Thrust force (N)].

Figure 13. Plot for composite desirability factor [Torque (N-m)].

Figure 13. Plot for composite desirability factor [Torque (N-m)].

Figure 14. Validation of MLP-ANN Thrust Force prediction using TDOE and RSM results.

Figure 14. Validation of MLP-ANN Thrust Force prediction using TDOE and RSM results.

Figure 15. Validation of MLP-ANN Torque prediction using TDOE and RSM results.

Figure 15. Validation of MLP-ANN Torque prediction using TDOE and RSM results.

Table 9. Validation of MLP-ANN prediction results using experimental data.