1,399
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY

Role of exclosure on woody species diversity in comparison to adjacent open grazing land: The case of wenago district, Southern Ethiopia

, &
Article: 2092264 | Received 02 Feb 2022, Accepted 16 Jun 2022, Published online: 24 Jun 2022

Figures & data

Figure 1. Location map of the study area. Source: Ethio GIS (2021).

Figure 1. Location map of the study area. Source: Ethio GIS (2021).

Table 1. List of trees, shrubs and herb recorded in exclosure and adjacent open grazing land of Wenago district

Table 2. Identified growth forms in exclosure and adjacent open grazing lands and an area they covered

Figure 2. Population frequency value of trees (left) and shrubs (right) in the sampled exclosure area of Wenago district.

Source: woody species inventory and measurement result (2021).
Figure 2. Population frequency value of trees (left) and shrubs (right) in the sampled exclosure area of Wenago district.

Figure 3. Population frequency value of trees (left) and shrubs (right) in the sampled open grazing land of Wenago district Source: woody species inventory and measurement result (2021).

Figure 3. Population frequency value of trees (left) and shrubs (right) in the sampled open grazing land of Wenago district Source: woody species inventory and measurement result (2021).

Figure 4. Percentage of plant growth forms (left) and origin of woody species (right) identified and recorded in the study area). Source: woody species inventory and measurement result (2021).

Figure 4. Percentage of plant growth forms (left) and origin of woody species (right) identified and recorded in the study area). Source: woody species inventory and measurement result (2021).

Table 3. Frequency and diversity (H') of woody species in exclosure of the study area (Wenago district)

Table 4. Comparison of species diversity indices (H’) and evenness species (E) between exclosure and adjacent open grazing land

Figure 5. The overview of physical difference between treated exclosure (Figure 5A) & the untreated adjacent open grazing land (Figure 5B) in the study area: Source: field observation and Photographs by the researcher (October, 2021).

Figure 5. The overview of physical difference between treated exclosure (Figure 5A) & the untreated adjacent open grazing land (Figure 5B) in the study area: Source: field observation and Photographs by the researcher (October, 2021).

Figure 6.. The linear relationship of woody species diversity with exclosure (a) and adjacent open grazing land (b).

Source: woody species data computation result (2021).
Figure 6.. The linear relationship of woody species diversity with exclosure (a) and adjacent open grazing land (b).

Table 5. Species composition similarity between exclosure and open grazing land using Sorenson’s species similarity index (%)

Figure 7. Focus group discussion under tree shadow (Picture 7A) and key informant interview in interviewee’s private house compound (Picture 7B). Source: interview and group discussion result. Photograph by the researcher (April, 2021).

Figure 7. Focus group discussion under tree shadow (Picture 7A) and key informant interview in interviewee’s private house compound (Picture 7B). Source: interview and group discussion result. Photograph by the researcher (April, 2021).