813
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Food Science & Technology

Adoption of Korra tef (Eragrostis tef) and its impact on farm households welfare: A propensity score matching estimation in North-Western Ethiopia

, , &
Article: 2247683 | Received 16 Oct 2022, Accepted 09 Aug 2023, Published online: 23 Aug 2023

Figures & data

Figure 1. Conceptual framework on Korra tef adoption and farm households’ welfare.

Sources: Authors’ construction.
Figure 1. Conceptual framework on Korra tef adoption and farm households’ welfare.

Figure 2. Map of the study areas.

Figure 2. Map of the study areas.

Table 1. Distribution of population and sample households across the study kebeles

Table 2. Consumption expenditures considered for calculating household welfare

Table 3. Definition and measurements of the independent variables used in the study

Table 4. Statistical summary of x2-test distribution for dummy and categorical variables

Table 5. Statistical summary of t-test for continuous variables

Table 6. Average tef production and net income by respondent types

Table 7. Categories of commercialization of tef producers in 2020

Table 8. HCI of tef producers in 2020

Figure 3. Kernel density estimate of household commercialization Index (HCI).

Source: STATA output (2020).
Figure 3. Kernel density estimate of household commercialization Index (HCI).

Table 9. The average expenditures of farm households

Table 10. The average expenditures of farm households (Etb/person/annum) vis-a-vis the HCI

Table 11. One-way ANOVA result for a comparison of expenditures of farm households with the levels of their commercialization

Table 12. Result of the VIF

Table 13. Contingency coefficients test for discrete variables

Table 14. Probit regression of adoption

Table 15. Propensity score and covariate matching for the variables used

Table 16. Comparison of the matching estimators for both productivity and income

Table 17. Distribution of estimated propensity scores

Figure 4. Distribution of propensity score generated from Kernel matching (0.1).

Source: STATA output (2020).
Figure 4. Distribution of propensity score generated from Kernel matching (0.1).

Table 18. Total expenditures per adult result of average treatment effect on the treated (ATT)

Table 19. Rosenbaum bounds sensitivity analysis (Kernel matching algorithm, bandwidth = 0.1)

Data availability statement

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.