625
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
SOIL & CROP SCIENCES

Optimizing nitrogen fertilizer and planting density levels for maize production under current climate conditions in Northwest Ethiopian midlands

, , , , &
Article: 2289721 | Received 25 Jul 2023, Accepted 27 Nov 2023, Published online: 03 Dec 2023

Figures & data

Figure 1. Location map of study locations.

Figure 1. Location map of study locations.

Figure 2. Mean monthly rainfall (RF), mean monthly maximum and minimum temperatures of the study area for two years from 2020–2022.

(Source: National Metrological Agency, Bahir Dar Branch)
Figure 2. Mean monthly rainfall (RF), mean monthly maximum and minimum temperatures of the study area for two years from 2020–2022.

Table 1. The crop management scenarios for maize production explored in northwest Ethiopia midland

Table 2. Monthly climate data from 1987 to 2018

Table 3. The average of the physicochemical properties of soil at four research locations served as the input for the DSSAT-CERES-maize model

Table 4. Genetic coefficients for the DSSAT CERES-Maize model

Table 5. Generated genetic coefficients using experimental BH540 maize cultivars

Table 6. The model calibration performance for days to anthesis, days to maturity, leaf area index, biomass, and grain yield for the medium maize cultivar of the BH540 over across two locations in 2020 and 2021

Table 7. The model evaluation performance for days to anthesis, days to maturity, leaf area index, biomass, and grain yield for the medium maize cultivar of the BH540 across four locations in 2022

Figure 3. Comparison of the simulated and observed above-ground biomass (A), grain yield (B), and leaf area index (C) values for the BH540 cultivars in the calibration experiment.

Figure 3. Comparison of the simulated and observed above-ground biomass (A), grain yield (B), and leaf area index (C) values for the BH540 cultivars in the calibration experiment.

Figure 4. Comparison of the simulated and observed above-ground biomass (D), grain yield (E), and leaf area index (F) values for the BH540 cultivars in the evaluation experiment.

Figure 4. Comparison of the simulated and observed above-ground biomass (D), grain yield (E), and leaf area index (F) values for the BH540 cultivars in the evaluation experiment.

Figure 5. Observed and simulated of grain yield.

Figure 5. Observed and simulated of grain yield.

Figure 6. Observed and simulated of above ground biomass.

Figure 6. Observed and simulated of above ground biomass.

Figure 7. Observed and simulated of leaf area index.

Figure 7. Observed and simulated of leaf area index.

Table 8. Observed and simulated values of grain yield, above ground biomass, and leaf area index

Data availability statement

The data used to support the findings of this study are included in the results part of the manuscript