920
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Ultra-high energy cosmic rays: Present and future

ORCID Icon | (Reviewing Editor)
Article: 1062216 | Received 04 May 2015, Accepted 12 May 2015, Published online: 09 Jul 2015

Figures & data

Figure 1. Top: The energy spectrum as measured by Auger (the numbers show the number of events in each energy bin); Bottom: The Auger energy spectrum is compared with the measurements of other experiments, in particular TA (see Schulz, for the Pierre Auger Collaboration, Citation2013 for details).

Figure 1. Top: The energy spectrum as measured by Auger (the numbers show the number of events in each energy bin); Bottom: The Auger energy spectrum is compared with the measurements of other experiments, in particular TA (see Schulz, for the Pierre Auger Collaboration, Citation2013 for details).

Figure 2. Number of event directions correlating with AGN as a function of the total number of events ordered by energy. The 1, 2 and 3σ bands are also shown (Selvon for the Pierre Auger Collaboration, Citation2014).

Figure 2. Number of event directions correlating with AGN as a function of the total number of events ordered by energy. The 1, 2 and 3σ bands are also shown (Selvon for the Pierre Auger Collaboration, Citation2014).

Figure 3. Current limits on the flux of primary photons are shown, together with the prediction for cosmogenic (GZK) and different types of exotic models (Abraham et al., The Pierre Auger Collaboration, Citation2009).

Figure 3. Current limits on the flux of primary photons are shown, together with the prediction for cosmogenic (GZK) and different types of exotic models (Abraham et al., The Pierre Auger Collaboration, Citation2009).

Figure 4. Depth of shower maximum: average value (left) and RMS (right). Auger results are shown together with model expectations (Aab et al., The Pierre Auger Collaboration, Citation2014 ; de Souza, for the Pierre Auger Collaboration, Citation2013).

Figure 4. Depth of shower maximum: average value (left) and RMS (right). Auger results are shown together with model expectations (Aab et al., The Pierre Auger Collaboration, Citation2014 ; de Souza, for the Pierre Auger Collaboration, Citation2013).

Figure 5. Muonic (Rμ) and electromagnetic (RE) shower sizes normalized to the prediction of different models for 1019 eV showers (Farrar, for the Pierre Auger Collaboration, Citation2013).

Figure 5. Muonic (Rμ) and electromagnetic (RE) shower sizes normalized to the prediction of different models for 1019 eV showers (Farrar, for the Pierre Auger Collaboration, Citation2013).