Figures & data
Figure 1. Schematic images of the crystal structure of various Bi-chalcogenide compounds. ((a)–(c)) Typical BiS2-based compounds: (a) REOBiCh2 (RE: rare earth or Bi; Ch: S, Se) (Maziopa et al., Citation2014; Mizuguchi, Demura, et al., Citation2012), (b) Eu3F4Bi2Ch4 (Zhai, Zhang, et al., Citation2014; Zhang et al., Citation2015), and (c) Bi4O4SO4Bi2S4 (Mizuguchi, Fujihisa, et al., Citation2012). The electrically conducting layer of these compounds is the two-layer-type Bi2S4 layer. (d) LaOM2S3 (M: Bi, Pb) (Sun et al., Citation2014). The M4S6 conducting layer of LaOM2S3 is similar to the Bi4Te6 layer of (e) CsBi4Te6 (Chung et al., Citation2000).
![Figure 1. Schematic images of the crystal structure of various Bi-chalcogenide compounds. ((a)–(c)) Typical BiS2-based compounds: (a) REOBiCh2 (RE: rare earth or Bi; Ch: S, Se) (Maziopa et al., Citation2014; Mizuguchi, Demura, et al., Citation2012), (b) Eu3F4Bi2Ch4 (Zhai, Zhang, et al., Citation2014; Zhang et al., Citation2015), and (c) Bi4O4SO4Bi2S4 (Mizuguchi, Fujihisa, et al., Citation2012). The electrically conducting layer of these compounds is the two-layer-type Bi2S4 layer. (d) LaOM2S3 (M: Bi, Pb) (Sun et al., Citation2014). The M4S6 conducting layer of LaOM2S3 is similar to the Bi4Te6 layer of (e) CsBi4Te6 (Chung et al., Citation2000).](/cms/asset/614efb0a-39d8-4feb-a79f-5b85b9caabf5/oaph_a_1156281_f0001_oc.gif)
Figure 2. ((a)–(c)) Temperature dependences of (a) electrical resistivity (ρ), (b) Seebeck coefficient (S), and (c) power factor (PF) for LaO1−xFxBiS2. (d) Schematic image of the crystal structure of LaO1−xFxBiS2 and electron doping scenario.
![Figure 2. ((a)–(c)) Temperature dependences of (a) electrical resistivity (ρ), (b) Seebeck coefficient (S), and (c) power factor (PF) for LaO1−xFxBiS2. (d) Schematic image of the crystal structure of LaO1−xFxBiS2 and electron doping scenario.](/cms/asset/7310e012-806d-4cba-ac78-1236ffcdd440/oaph_a_1156281_f0002_oc.gif)
Figure 3. ((a)–(c)) Temperature dependences of (a) electrical resistivity (ρ), (b) Seebeck coefficient (S), and (c) power factor (PF) for LaOBiS2−xSex. (d) Schematic image of the crystal structure of LaOBiS2−xSex and the definitions of the Ch1 and Ch2 sites.
![Figure 3. ((a)–(c)) Temperature dependences of (a) electrical resistivity (ρ), (b) Seebeck coefficient (S), and (c) power factor (PF) for LaOBiS2−xSex. (d) Schematic image of the crystal structure of LaOBiS2−xSex and the definitions of the Ch1 and Ch2 sites.](/cms/asset/d55f5c16-1895-4441-8c3b-884a03303251/oaph_a_1156281_f0003_oc.gif)
Figure 4. (a) XRD patterns for hot-pressed (HP) LaOBiSSe (x = 1). The Miller indices are shown with the top profile. The asterisk indicates the impurity (La2O3: 7% against the major phase) peak. To investigate the crystal structure anisotropy, XRD measurements were performed for polished pellets with two scattering vectors of P// and P⊥. (b) Schematic image for the definitions of the measurement directions of P// and P⊥ and the hot-pressing direction. ((c)–(f)) Temperature dependences of (c) electrical resistivity (ρ), (d) Seebeck coefficient (S), (e) thermal conductivity (κ), and dimensionless figure-of-merit (ZT) for HP-LaOBiSSe.
![Figure 4. (a) XRD patterns for hot-pressed (HP) LaOBiSSe (x = 1). The Miller indices are shown with the top profile. The asterisk indicates the impurity (La2O3: 7% against the major phase) peak. To investigate the crystal structure anisotropy, XRD measurements were performed for polished pellets with two scattering vectors of P// and P⊥. (b) Schematic image for the definitions of the measurement directions of P// and P⊥ and the hot-pressing direction. ((c)–(f)) Temperature dependences of (c) electrical resistivity (ρ), (d) Seebeck coefficient (S), (e) thermal conductivity (κ), and dimensionless figure-of-merit (ZT) for HP-LaOBiSSe.](/cms/asset/df325a64-8c3a-4dbd-a9e2-dd6d2d94e1f3/oaph_a_1156281_f0004_oc.gif)
Figure 5. ((a)–(c)) Temperature dependences of (a) electrical resistivity (ρ), Seebeck coefficient (S), and power factor (PF) for CeO1−xFxBiS2. ((d)–(f)) Temperature dependences of (d) ρ, (e) S, and (f) PF for NdO1−xFxBiS2.
![Figure 5. ((a)–(c)) Temperature dependences of (a) electrical resistivity (ρ), Seebeck coefficient (S), and power factor (PF) for CeO1−xFxBiS2. ((d)–(f)) Temperature dependences of (d) ρ, (e) S, and (f) PF for NdO1−xFxBiS2.](/cms/asset/aacbfefe-0e62-41b9-992a-7d315583056a/oaph_a_1156281_f0005_oc.gif)
Figure 6. Temperature dependences of (a) electrical resistivity (ρ) and (b) Seebeck coefficient (S) for EuFBiS2. (c) Schematic image of the crystal structure of EuFBiS2.
![Figure 6. Temperature dependences of (a) electrical resistivity (ρ) and (b) Seebeck coefficient (S) for EuFBiS2. (c) Schematic image of the crystal structure of EuFBiS2.](/cms/asset/8904336b-1aa8-4376-a846-accf2ec1c959/oaph_a_1156281_f0006_oc.gif)
Figure 7. ((a)–(c)) Temperature dependences of (a) electrical resistivity (ρ), Seebeck coefficient (S), and power factor (PF) for LaOBiPbS3. (d) Schematic image of the crystal structure of LaOBiPbS3.
![Figure 7. ((a)–(c)) Temperature dependences of (a) electrical resistivity (ρ), Seebeck coefficient (S), and power factor (PF) for LaOBiPbS3. (d) Schematic image of the crystal structure of LaOBiPbS3.](/cms/asset/ee0f2777-6799-4a02-a9f0-0d705fdabac7/oaph_a_1156281_f0007_oc.gif)
Figure 8. The Seebeck coefficient (S) for several Bi-chalcogenide samples (parent phases) are plotted as a function of the carrier concentration (n) (log scale for n).
![Figure 8. The Seebeck coefficient (S) for several Bi-chalcogenide samples (parent phases) are plotted as a function of the carrier concentration (n) (log scale for n).](/cms/asset/bacb3134-5fc6-4c2d-b3c7-53f183164989/oaph_a_1156281_f0008_oc.gif)