“The appraisal prepared for keeping an eye out for the upkeep of twenty to thirty-year-olds representatives of Indian endeavors in Delhi: An advancing test looked by different associations over the globe”

Figures & data

Figure 1. Consecutive Intervention Model

Table 1. Descriptive Statistics and Correlations (N = 314)

Variable		M	SD	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8
1	Age-group a	2.5861	0.5436	-
2	Gender b	1.2301	0.4263	−0.012	-
3	Education c	2.221	0.6779	0.044	−0.14	-
4	Experience d	3.2814	0.7712	−0.097	−.426**	0.218	-
5	Coaching	3.9883	0.6827	0.212	.136*	.773**	−.773*	(.944)
6	PHH	4.1488	0.586	0.085	.107**	−.526**	.511**	.535*	(.882)
7	EC	3.3398	0.8459	0.098	1–83*	.210*	.210*	.540*	.320**	(.731)
8	Intention to stay	3.4615	0.5718	0.219	.127**	.537**	.537*	.383*	.210**	.402*	(.756)

Note. Reliability estimates (Cronbach’s alphas) are in parentheses.

a In years: 1 = 20–24 (29%), 2 = 25–29 (55%), 3 = 29–34 (16%). b1 = Male (77%), 2 = Female (23%). c1 = Diploma (24%), 2 = Graduate (54%), 3 = Post Graduate (22%). d In years: 1 = 0–2 (22%), 2 = 2–4 (40%), 3 = 4–6 (28%), 4 = > 6 (10%). *p < .01. **p < .05

Table 2. The Fit Indices for Alternative Measurement Models

Model	χ^2	df	χ^2/df	CFI	GFI	TLI	RMSEA
Model 1	2,627.74***	1,732	1.517	0.95	0.96	0.93	0.038
Model 2	4,894.32***	1,787	2.738	0.63	0.69	0.64	0.067
Model 3	5,237.67***	1,799	2.911	0.6	0.62	0.58	0.081

Note. CFI = Comparative Fit Index; GFI = Goodness of Fit Index; TLI = Tucker-Lewis Index; RMSA = Root Mean Square Error of Approximation. ***p < .001.

Table 3. Path Coefficients and Indirect Effects for Mediation Models

		Path coefficients to			Indirect effects
					Symmetric 95%	Bootstrap 95%
Model	Intention to stay	PHH	EC	Estimates	Confidence Interval	Confidence Interval
Coaching	0.20* (.13)	0.25* (.05)	0.37* (.17)
PHH	0.61* (.23)		0.31** (.40)
EC	0.66* (.05)
Total				0.24(.05)	−.06, .24	−.07, .27
M→POS→ITS				−.0.7 (.05)	.15, .03	−.18, .02
M→AC→ITS				.14 (.05)	.35, .21	−.36, .20
M→POS→AC→ITS				.08 (.04)	.03, .19	.03, .21

Note: N = 314. Bootstrap confidence intervals were constructed using 2000 resamples. Total effect (M → ITS) = 0.38 (.08). Standard error in parentheses. *p < .01. **p < .05